-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scala 2.13.12 (was 2.13.10) #18525
Scala 2.13.12 (was 2.13.10) #18525
Conversation
I would add the missing MiMa filter for
|
Maybe we can also remove https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/blob/main/project/TastyMiMaFilters.scala#L45-L47 |
@nicolasstucki will do and while I've got your attention, I just noticed that 3.3.1 ships with 2.13.10 stdlib. this is unfortunate — 2.13.11 came out months ago. will this PR fix it for 3.3.2, if I add the "backport requested" label? @Kordyjan maybe you could add this to the Scala 3 release steps, to check that you aren't shipping an out of date Scala 2 stdlib? |
Yes, but we should double-check if changing this version in a patch release if binary-compatible. I suspect that this would not be a binary-compatible change due to these incompatibilities:
Though these appear when compiling the library with Scala 3, which is not yet fully stable. Therefore these could be irrelevant. |
We have binary compatibility checks in the scala/scala repo, so I believe that should be considered sufficient assurance. All of the 2.13.x stdlibs are known to be both forward and backward compatible with each other. |
context: scala/scala3#18525, which upgrades Scala 3 to use the 2.13.12 stdlib; MiMa there is complaining
context: scala/scala3#18525, which upgrades Scala 3 to use the 2.13.12 stdlib; MiMa there is complaining
context: scala/scala3#18525, which upgrades Scala 3 to use the 2.13.12 stdlib; MiMa there is complaining
agree. PR: scala/scala#10549 |
Not yet, I don't think, since we're jumping straight from 2.13.10 to 2.13.12 here. (I've changed the PR title to make that more obvious.) |
f24b897
to
f67d50b
Compare
Reviewers: if you're wondering why |
@nicolasstucki this is ready for you to take a second look at |
No description provided.