-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for #288 and minor corrections #289
Conversation
camera.py was in test mode, switched to normal mode. drawable.py as discussed the robot icon is now draw in red 75% with outer at 100% in error condition Signed-off-by: [email protected] <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (1)
Line range hint
442-449
: Consider making test data path configurable 🎯The hardcoded test data path could cause issues if the directory structure changes. Consider making this configurable or using a relative path.
- file_to_load="custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/snapshots/test.json", + file_to_load=os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "snapshots", "test.json"),custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/utils/drawable.py (2)
429-430
: Sweet color handling for error states! 🚨The red color choice for error states makes the robot super visible when something's wrong. Nice touch making it semi-transparent with that 191 alpha value - keeps it noticeable without being too in-your-face.
Though, might want to consider extracting these magic color values into constants at the class level:
class Drawable: + # Robot state colors + ERROR_OUTLINE = (255, 0, 0, 255) # Solid red + ERROR_FILL = (255, 0, 0, 191) # Semi-transparent red @staticmethod async def robot( layers: NumpyArray, x: int, y: int, angle: float, fill: Color, robot_state: str | None = None, ) -> NumpyArray: if robot_state == "error": - outline = (255, 0, 0, 255) - fill = (255, 0, 0, 191) + outline = Drawable.ERROR_OUTLINE + fill = Drawable.ERROR_FILL
429-430
: Level up the error state handling! 🎮Consider expanding the error state handling to support different types of errors with distinct visual cues. For example:
@staticmethod async def robot( layers: NumpyArray, x: int, y: int, angle: float, fill: Color, robot_state: str | None = None, ) -> NumpyArray: - if robot_state == "error": + if robot_state == "critical_error": outline = (255, 0, 0, 255) # Red fill = (255, 0, 0, 191) + elif robot_state == "warning": + outline = (255, 165, 0, 255) # Orange + fill = (255, 165, 0, 191) + elif robot_state == "stuck": + outline = (128, 0, 128, 255) # Purple + fill = (128, 0, 128, 191)This would give users more detailed visual feedback about what's wrong with their robot. Each state could have its own distinct color scheme while maintaining the semi-transparent fill pattern.
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py (4)
111-112
: Add type hints to class attributesConsider adding type hints to improve code maintainability:
- self.data = {} - self.camera_options = {} + self.data: Dict[str, Any] = {} + self.camera_options: Dict[str, Any] = {}
182-188
: Consider adding error handling for config entry initializationThe initialization looks good, but consider adding error handling for cases where the config entry might be invalid.
def __init__(self, config_entry: ConfigEntry): """Initialize options flow.""" + if not config_entry or not config_entry.unique_id: + raise ConfigEntryError("Invalid config entry") self.camera_config = config_entry self.unique_id = self.camera_config.unique_id self.camera_options = {}
Line range hint
868-878
: Add error handling to options savingThe options saving process should handle potential errors during the update process.
async def async_step_opt_save(self): """Save the options in a sorted way. It stores all the options.""" _LOGGER.info(f"Storing Updated Camera ({self.camera_config.unique_id}) Options.") - _, vacuum_device = get_vacuum_device_info( - self.camera_config.data.get(CONF_VACUUM_CONFIG_ENTRY_ID), self.hass - ) - opt_update = await update_options(self.bk_options, self.camera_options) - _LOGGER.debug(f"updated options:{dict(opt_update)}") - return self.async_create_entry( - title="", - data=opt_update, - ) + try: + _, vacuum_device = get_vacuum_device_info( + self.camera_config.data.get(CONF_VACUUM_CONFIG_ENTRY_ID), self.hass + ) + opt_update = await update_options(self.bk_options, self.camera_options) + _LOGGER.debug(f"updated options:{dict(opt_update)}") + return self.async_create_entry( + title="", + data=opt_update, + ) + except Exception as e: + _LOGGER.error(f"Failed to save options: {e}") + return self.async_abort(reason="save_error")
873-874
: Optimize logging performanceUsing
%
formatting orstr.format()
for logging is more efficient than f-strings, especially when the log level is not enabled.- _LOGGER.debug(f"updated options:{dict(opt_update)}") + _LOGGER.debug("updated options: %s", dict(opt_update))
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py
(1 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py
(32 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/utils/drawable.py
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py (1)
Learnt from: sca075
PR: sca075/mqtt_vacuum_camera#196
File: custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py:352-355
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T05:06:42.185Z
Learning: Changes in `config_flow.py` now include handling for `floor_only` and `alpha_floor` steps based on the number of rooms, ensuring proper configuration and error handling for unexpected values of `number_of_rooms`.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/camera.py (2)
Line range hint 327-332
: Solid error handling improvement! 🛡️
The addition of proper error handling for JSON parsing failures makes the code more resilient. Setting _vac_json_available
to "Error" provides good feedback for debugging.
Line range hint 441-449
: Verify test mode usage across the codebase 🔍
Let's verify how test mode is being used across the codebase to ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality.
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py (1)
14-14
: LGTM! Clean import refactoring
The change from config_entries.ConfigEntry
to direct ConfigEntry
import improves code readability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py (2)
185-190
: Good addition of error handling, but consider enhancing the error messageThe error handling for missing config entry is good, but the error message could be more descriptive.
if not config_entry: - raise ConfigEntryError("Config entry is required.") + raise ConfigEntryError("Config entry is required for camera configuration initialization.")
Line range hint
356-361
: Enhance room count validationWhile the room count validation is good, consider adding an upper limit check to prevent potential issues with extremely large room counts.
if ( not isinstance(self.number_of_rooms, int) - or self.number_of_rooms < DEFAULT_ROOMS + or self.number_of_rooms < DEFAULT_ROOMS + or self.number_of_rooms > 16 # Add upper limit check ): errors["base"] = "no_rooms" _LOGGER.error("No rooms found in the configuration. Aborting.")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py
(33 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/utils/drawable.py
(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/utils/drawable.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py (1)
Learnt from: sca075
PR: sca075/mqtt_vacuum_camera#196
File: custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py:352-355
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T05:06:42.185Z
Learning: Changes in `config_flow.py` now include handling for `floor_only` and `alpha_floor` steps based on the number of rooms, ensuring proper configuration and error handling for unexpected values of `number_of_rooms`.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/config_flow.py (1)
Line range hint 599-611
: LGTM: Floor configuration aligns with previous learnings
The implementation of floor_only step correctly handles the single room case as discussed in previous learnings.
As per comment in the commit config_flow fix for #288 and minor changes on robot error condition drawing and camera switch from test mode to normal mode
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes