-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #91024
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #91024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The `advance_by(n)` docs state that in the error case `Err(k)` that k is always less than n. It also states that `advance_by(0)` may return `Err(0)` to indicate an exhausted iterator. These statements are inconsistent. Since only one implementation (Skip) actually made use of that I changed it to return Ok(()) in that case too. While adding some tests I also found a bug in `Take::advance_back_by`.
In some situations we should want on influence into the .cargo/config when we use vendored source. One example is rust-lang#90764, when we want to workaround some references to crates forked and living in git, that are missing in the vendor/ directory. This commit will create the .cargo/config file only when the .cargo/ directory needs to be created.
Because it's always `'tcx`. In fact, some of them use a mixture of passed-in `$tcx` and hard-coded `'tcx`, so no other lifetime would even work. This makes the code easier to read.
Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`). In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls. We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`). Address part of rust-lang#89418.
`predicates_of` no longer changes when changing a trait's front matter because we no longer include the trait's span in the identity trait obligation.
Group obligations by `impl` block that introduced them.
Also use `Default::default()` in one `TypedArena::default()`, for consistency with `DroplessArena::default()`.
Make char conversion functions unstably const The char conversion functions like `char::from_u32` do trivial computations and can easily be converted into const fns. Only smaller tricks are needed to avoid non-const standard library functions like `Result::ok` or `bool::then_some`. Tracking issue: rust-lang#89259
…=nagisa Point at source of trait bound obligations in more places Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`). In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls. We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`). We no longer point at associated items (`ImplObligation`), as they didn't add any user actionable information, they just added noise. Address part of rust-lang#89418.
…tolnay Fix Iterator::advance_by contract inconsistency The `advance_by(n)` docs state that in the error case `Err(k)` that k is always less than n. It also states that `advance_by(0)` may return `Err(0)` to indicate an exhausted iterator. These statements are inconsistent. Since only one implementation (Skip) actually made use of that I changed it to return Ok(()) in that case too. While adding some tests I also found a bug in `Take::advance_back_by`.
…ents, r=estebank Improve suggestions for compatible variants on type mismatch. Fixes rust-lang#90553. Before: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/783247/140385675-6ff41090-eca2-41bc-b161-99c5dabfec61.png) After: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/783247/140385748-20cf26b5-ea96-4e56-8af2-5fe1ab16fd3b.png) r? ``@estebank``
add const generics test cc rust-lang#89829 (comment) r? rust-lang/project-const-generics
…mulacrum bootstap: create .cargo/config only if not present In some situations we should want on influence into the .cargo/config when we use vendored source. One example is rust-lang#90764, when we want to workaround some references to crates forked and living in git, that are missing in the vendor/ directory. This commit will create the .cargo/config file only when the .cargo/ directory needs to be created.
windows: Return the "Not Found" error when a path is empty Fixes rust-lang#90940
Arenas cleanup I was looking closely at the arenas code and here are some small improvement to readability.
fix CTFE/Miri simd_insert/extract on array-style repr(simd) types The changed test would previously fail since `place_index` would just return the only field of `f32x4`, i.e., the array -- rather than *indexing into* the array which is what we have to do. The new helper methods will also be needed for rust-lang/miri#1912. r? `@oli-obk`
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
📌 Commit 7131806 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Nov 18, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
⌛ Testing commit 7131806 with merge 6c3bf3e3f32bc80f60806ad502cc42ad85d0d936... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Nov 18, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup