Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clean up E0276 explanation #68928

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2020
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 7, 2020
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 7, 2020

📌 Commit 26020f5 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 7, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2020
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #68164 (Selectively disable sanitizer instrumentation)
 - #68413 (Add GitHub issue templates)
 - #68889 (Move the `hir().krate()` method to a query and remove the `Krate` dep node)
 - #68909 (Respect --nocapture in panic=abort test mode)
 - #68910 (Add myself to .mailmap)
 - #68919 (Remove HashStable impl for ast::Lifetime)
 - #68928 (clean up E0276 explanation)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 26020f5 into rust-lang:master Feb 7, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the cleanup-e0276 branch February 8, 2020 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants