Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove incorrect words about libcore's stability #30415

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2015

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ bf14d8f rollup

@@ -23,12 +23,6 @@
//! nor does it provide concurrency or I/O. These things require
//! platform integration, and this library is platform-agnostic.
//!
//! *It is not recommended to use the core library*. The stable
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might still want to leave something here saying that most users will want to use libstd instead?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well that's kinda true but also why the facade is controversial. I do agree that explaining more of the divide here would be good, but in this patch, I'm more focused on removing inaccuracy than I am making these docs great.

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2015
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2015
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2015
@bors bors merged commit bf14d8f into rust-lang:master Dec 18, 2015
@steveklabnik steveklabnik deleted the remove_bad_stability_note branch June 19, 2016 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants