Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new solver during selection #107279

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? @lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 24, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 24, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 24, 2023

⌛ Trying commit f4c9cf567a41cca588f7c75b5b52533b03d93877 with merge 581abf9c75ddf7cdfc533d9426c6c5e7a7ff8789...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 25, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 581abf9c75ddf7cdfc533d9426c6c5e7a7ff8789 (581abf9c75ddf7cdfc533d9426c6c5e7a7ff8789)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (581abf9c75ddf7cdfc533d9426c6c5e7a7ff8789): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.9% [-1.0%, -0.9%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.9% [0.8%, 1.0%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.9% [0.8%, 1.0%] 2

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 25, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

Oh cool, so it must've just been noise when I tested previously.

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Jan 25, 2023

cool

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 25, 2023

📌 Commit f4c9cf567a41cca588f7c75b5b52533b03d93877 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 25, 2023
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Jan 26, 2023

@bors rollup=always

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Jan 26, 2023

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 26, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed to use full path

@bors r=lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 26, 2023

📌 Commit 9b5a2a4 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 26, 2023
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
…e, r=lcnr

Use new solver during selection

r? `@lcnr`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#105784 (update stdarch)
 - rust-lang#106856 (core: Support variety of atomic widths in width-agnostic functions)
 - rust-lang#107171 (rustc_metadata: Fix `encode_attrs`)
 - rust-lang#107242 (rustdoc: make item links consistently use `title="{shortty} {path}"`)
 - rust-lang#107279 (Use new solver during selection)
 - rust-lang#107284 (rustdoc: use smarter encoding for playground URL)
 - rust-lang#107325 (rustdoc: Stop using `HirId`s)
 - rust-lang#107336 (rustdoc: remove mostly-unused CSS classes `import-item` and `module-item`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5683915 into rust-lang:master Jan 27, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Jan 27, 2023
@lcnr lcnr mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2023
11 tasks
@lcnr lcnr added the WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) label Jan 27, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the new-solver-evaluate branch August 11, 2023 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants