-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed #104078
Conversation
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
9d8cb56
to
72a669a
Compare
Some changes occurred in src/tools/cargo cc @ehuss |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
r=me with nit fixed
aac2031
to
fd1a393
Compare
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup |
…mulacrum Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed This makes it a lot easier to understand what commands will be run without having to parse the `-vv` output, which isn't meant to be user facing. I also want to change these messages at some point (rust-lang#102003) and this change will make it easier to paste a before/after comparison without having to actually build a stage 2 compiler.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@bors r- |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #103569) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
5352eb8
to
df6b04a
Compare
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup=maybe |
📌 Commit df6b04a1fd11c55ca5184e7ab23454f1ef477828 has been approved by It is now in the queue for this repository. |
…earth Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#101939 (Add loongarch64 abi support) - rust-lang#103863 (Use `TraitEngine` in more places, restrict visibility of `FulfillmentCtxt` constructor) - rust-lang#104036 (Suggest `is_some` when we've found `Option` but expected `bool`) - rust-lang#104060 (Make `Hash`, `Hasher` and `BuildHasher` `#[const_trait]` and make `Sip` const `Hasher`) - rust-lang#104077 (Use aapcs for efiapi calling convention on arm) - rust-lang#104186 (Tighten the 'introduce new binding' suggestion) - rust-lang#104194 (`EarlyBinder` docs) - rust-lang#104233 (Don't ICE when encountering `ConstKind::Error` in `RequiredConstsVisitor`) - rust-lang#104235 (Use `const_error_with_guaranteed` more) Failed merges: - rust-lang#104078 (Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed) - rust-lang#104169 (Migrate `:target` rules to use CSS variables) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104236) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This makes it a lot easier to understand what commands will be run without having to parse the `-vv` output, which isn't meant to be user facing.
df6b04a
to
2437888
Compare
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup=iffy (bitrotty) |
…mulacrum Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed This makes it a lot easier to understand what commands will be run without having to parse the `-vv` output, which isn't meant to be user facing. I also want to change these messages at some point (rust-lang#102003) and this change will make it easier to paste a before/after comparison without having to actually build a stage 2 compiler.
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (229e875): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
|
Print "Checking/Building ..." message even when --dry-run is passed
This makes it a lot easier to understand what commands will be run without
having to parse the
-vv
output, which isn't meant to be user facing.I also want to change these messages at some point (#102003) and this change will make it easier to paste a before/after comparison without having to actually build a stage 2 compiler.