-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update API docs and conventions for fail -> panic #18677
Labels
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Comments
brson
added
A-docs
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
labels
Nov 6, 2014
@steveklabnik I see you handled most of it in #17894 😄 |
@subhashb sure, if you'd like to, feel free :) |
@subhashb Note that I fixed a few in collections in my reform branch. Hopefully will land today. |
@gankro Noted. Will skip around those files while your PR gets merged. |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2014
…nic, r=steveklabnik I have also renamed `fail` to `panic` in some non-documentation comments, where I thought it mattered. Fixes #18677 cc @steveklabnik
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
internal: Implement `naked_asm!` builtin
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Many of the in-tree API docs still have
#Failure
sections. The new convention appears to be#Panics
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: