Enable lldb tests on the mac bots #16112
Comments
|
Fixed by #18092 |
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2024
…r=Veykril fix: rewrite code_action `generate_delegate_trait` I've made substantial enhancements to the "generate delegate trait" code action in rust-analyzer. Here's a summary of the changes: #### Resolved the "Can’t find [email protected] in AstIdMap" error Fix rust-lang#15804, fix rust-lang#15968, fix rust-lang#15108 The issue stemmed from an incorrect application of PathTransform in the original code. Previously, a new 'impl' was generated first and then transformed, causing PathTransform to fail in locating the correct AST node, resulting in an error. I rectified this by performing the transformation before generating the new 'impl' (using make::impl_trait), ensuring a step-by-step transformation of associated items. #### Rectified generation of `Self` type `generate_delegate_trait` is unable to properly handle trait with `Self` type. Let's take the following code as an example: ```rust trait Trait { fn f() -> Self; } struct B {} impl Trait for B { fn f() -> B { B{} } } struct S { b: B, } ``` Here, if we implement `Trait` for `S`, the type of `f` should be `() -> Self`, i.e. `() -> S`. However we cannot automatically generate a function that constructs `S`. To ensure that the code action doesn't generate delegate traits for traits with Self types, I add a function named `has_self_type` to handle it. #### Extended support for generics in structs and fields within this code action The former version of `generate_delegate_trait` cannot handle structs with generics properly. Here's an example: ```rust struct B<T> { a: T } trait Trait<T> { fn f(a: T); } impl<T1, T2> Trait<T1> for B<T2> { fn f(a: T1) -> T2 { self.a } } struct A {} struct S { b$0 : B<A>, } ``` The former version will generates improper code: ```rust impl<T1, T2> Trait<T1, T2> for S { fn f(&self, a: T1) -> T1 { <B as Trait<T1, T2>>::f( &self.b , a) } } ``` The rewritten version can handle generics properly: ```rust impl<T1> Trait<T1> for S { fn f(&self, a: T1) -> T1 { <B<A> as Trait<T1>>::f(&self.b, a) } } ``` See more examples in added unit tests. I enabled support for generic structs in `generate_delegate_trait` through the following steps (using the code example provided): 1. Initially, to prevent conflicts between the generic parameters in struct `S` and the ones in the impl of `B`, I renamed the generic parameters of `S`. 2. Then, since `B`'s parameters are instantiated within `S`, the original generic parameters of `B` needed removal within `S` (to avoid errors from redundant parameters). An important consideration here arises when Trait and B share parameters in `B`'s impl. In such cases, these shared generic parameters cannot be removed. 3. Next, I addressed the matching of types between `B`'s type in `S` and its type in the impl. Given that some generic parameters in the impl are instantiated in `B`, I replaced these parameters with their instantiated results using PathTransform. For instance, in the example provided, matching `B<A>` and `B<T2>`, where `T2` is instantiated as `A`, I replaced all occurrences of `T2` in the impl with `A` (i.e. apply the instantiated generic arguments to the params). 4. Finally, I performed transformations on each assoc item (also to prevent the initial issue) and handled redundant where clauses. For a more detailed explanation, please refer to the code and comments. I welcome suggestions and any further questions!
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 8, 2024
…gate-trait, r=Veykril internal: clean and enhance readability for `generate_delegate_trait` Continue from rust-lang#16112 This PR primarily involves some cleanup and simple refactoring work, including: - Adding numerous comments to layer the code and explain the behavior of each step. - Renaming some variables to make them more sensible. - Simplify certain operations using a more elegant approach. The goal is to make this intricate implementation clearer and facilitate future maintenance. In addition to this, the PR also removes redundant `path_transform` operations for `type_gen_args`. Taking the example of `impl Trait<T1> for S<S1>`, where `S1` is considered. The struct `S` must be in the file where the user triggers code actions, so there's no need for the `path_transform`. Furthermore, before performing the transform, we've already renamed `S1`, ensuring it won't clash with existing generics parameters. Therefore, there's no need to transform it.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We have an lldb test suite that we don't want to bitrot. Because lldb is a moving target it we tend to need a specific version, which the bots need to be configured with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: