-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Redact conditional compile-fail warning #14064
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I got a CI failure because the following line showed up: ``` [WARNING] build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish... ``` I'm assumin this is a race condition in the test for whether the successful target completed before the error or not. Before snapbox, we used a `contains` check which didn't have this problem. I'm replacing this with a `...` multi-line (0+) glob.
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jun 13, 2024
1 task
weihanglo
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2024
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 13, 2024
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2024
Update cargo 13 commits in 4dcbca118ab7f9ffac4728004c983754bc6a04ff..a1f47ec3f7cd076986f1bfcd7061f2e8cb1a726e 2024-06-11 16:27:02 +0000 to 2024-06-15 01:10:07 +0000 - Change verification order during packaging. (rust-lang/cargo#14074) - Update git2 for libgit2 1.8.1 (rust-lang/cargo#14067) - Fix some documentation misspellings (rust-lang/cargo#14066) - chore(deps): update msrv (1 version) to v1.79 (rust-lang/cargo#14063) - test: Redact conditional compile-fail warning (rust-lang/cargo#14064) - Migrate a few test files to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14048) - docs(contrib): Improve triage instructions (rust-lang/cargo#14052) - chore(ci): Upgrade cargo-semver-checks (rust-lang/cargo#14062) - Revert rust-lang/cargo#13630 as rustc ignores `-C strip` on MSVC (rust-lang/cargo#14061) - test: migrate features_are_quoted to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14051) - Add assert redactions (rust-lang/cargo#14054) - test: migrate build_script_env to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14044) - docs: Iterate on --breaking docs (rust-lang/cargo#14047) r? ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I got a CI failure because the following line showed up:
I'm assumin this is a race condition in the test for whether the successful target completed before the error or not.
Before snapbox, we used a
contains
check which didn't have this problem. I'm replacing this with a...
multi-line (0+) glob.