-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: migrate features_are_quoted to snapbox #14051
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @ehuss (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the contribution!
tests/testsuite/shell_quoting.rs
Outdated
error[E0425]: cannot find value `error` in this scope | ||
--> src/main.rs:1:12 | ||
| | ||
1 | fn main() {error} | ||
| ^^^^^ not found in this scope | ||
|
||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Snapshotting rustc output is a bit risky. If applicable we should omit it by ...
.
error[E0425]: cannot find value `error` in this scope | |
--> src/main.rs:1:12 | |
| | |
1 | fn main() {error} | |
| ^^^^^ not found in this scope | |
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`. | |
... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By risky I mean rustc output is not guaranteed stable and might break cargo test suites between different toolchain versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added this to the porting steps
- If replacing a
contains
with an equality check, use multi-line globs (...
) for rustc errors that weren't previously matched to minimize tying Cargo's tests to the exact output of rustc
Co-authored-by: Weihang Lo <[email protected]>
4851d22
to
3a19de7
Compare
Thanks! @bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Update cargo 13 commits in 4dcbca118ab7f9ffac4728004c983754bc6a04ff..a1f47ec3f7cd076986f1bfcd7061f2e8cb1a726e 2024-06-11 16:27:02 +0000 to 2024-06-15 01:10:07 +0000 - Change verification order during packaging. (rust-lang/cargo#14074) - Update git2 for libgit2 1.8.1 (rust-lang/cargo#14067) - Fix some documentation misspellings (rust-lang/cargo#14066) - chore(deps): update msrv (1 version) to v1.79 (rust-lang/cargo#14063) - test: Redact conditional compile-fail warning (rust-lang/cargo#14064) - Migrate a few test files to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14048) - docs(contrib): Improve triage instructions (rust-lang/cargo#14052) - chore(ci): Upgrade cargo-semver-checks (rust-lang/cargo#14062) - Revert rust-lang/cargo#13630 as rustc ignores `-C strip` on MSVC (rust-lang/cargo#14061) - test: migrate features_are_quoted to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14051) - Add assert redactions (rust-lang/cargo#14054) - test: migrate build_script_env to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14044) - docs: Iterate on --breaking docs (rust-lang/cargo#14047) r? ghost
What does this PR try to resolve?
Part of #14039.
Migrate
tests/testsuite/shell_quoting.rs
to snapbox.How should we test and review this PR?
N/A
Additional information
N/A