-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate JTC switching demo to example_1 #243
Integrate JTC switching demo to example_1 #243
Conversation
I realized the same misleading results as described here ros-controls/ros2_control#786 |
@@ -497,140 +497,3 @@ Available controllers: | |||
|
|||
Moving the robot: | |||
- see below description of `forward_position_controller` | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would also add into the main readme that example of controller switching is under example 1. What do you think?
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ | |||
<depend>rclcpp</depend> | |||
<depend>rclcpp_lifecycle</depend> | |||
|
|||
<exec_depend>ros2_controllers_test_nodes</exec_depend> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't all packages automatically depend on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what do you mean by automatically?
I would say that lots of dependencies are actually missing here, joint_trajectory_controller
etc. Or would you include this in the ros2_control_demo meta package? (which has to be updated as well)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should include them in the package they are used. The question is here if not also all other examples depend on this packaged because it is also used there for moving the robot
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, these dependencies are missing for all examples. I can add them to all examples once this one is merged into new structure branch?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes please!
Co-authored-by: Dr. Denis <[email protected]>
also closes #75 and #220