Specifying custom extensions in the -march string #1
Comments
|
How about For our internal porting we using |
cmuellner
added a commit
to cmuellner/riscv-toolchain-conventions
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2022
This is essentially a collection of all recent change requests for the -march string: * Relax the ISA string order ([1]) * Add custom extensions ([2]) * Add profiles support ([3]) Most of this patch is based on proposals from Kito Cheng <[email protected]> (see linked resources below). [1] riscv-non-isa#14 [2] riscv-non-isa#1 [3] https://lists.riscv.org/g/sig-toolchains/message/379 [4] riscv-non-isa#11 Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <[email protected]>
cmuellner
added a commit
to cmuellner/riscv-toolchain-conventions
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2022
This is essentially a collection of all recent change requests for the -march string: * Relax the ISA string order ([1]) * Add custom extensions ([2]) * Add profiles support ([3]) Most of this patch is based on proposals from Kito Cheng <[email protected]> (see linked resources below). [1] riscv-non-isa#14 [2] riscv-non-isa#1 [3] https://lists.riscv.org/g/sig-toolchains/message/379 [4] riscv-non-isa#11 Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <[email protected]>
cmuellner
added a commit
to cmuellner/riscv-toolchain-conventions
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
This is essentially a collection of all recent change requests for the -march string: * Relax the ISA string order ([1]) * Add custom extensions ([2]) * Add profiles support ([3]) Most of this patch is based on proposals from Kito Cheng <[email protected]> (see linked resources below). [1] riscv-non-isa#14 [2] riscv-non-isa#1 [3] https://lists.riscv.org/g/sig-toolchains/message/379 [4] riscv-non-isa#11 Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <[email protected]>
cmuellner
added a commit
to cmuellner/riscv-toolchain-conventions
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
This is essentially a collection of all recent change requests for the -march string: * Relax the ISA string order ([1]) * Add custom extensions ([2]) * Add profiles support ([3]) Most of this patch is based on proposals from Kito Cheng <[email protected]> (see linked resources below). [1] riscv-non-isa#14 [2] riscv-non-isa#1 [3] https://lists.riscv.org/g/sig-toolchains/message/379 [4] riscv-non-isa#11 Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <[email protected]>
cmuellner
added a commit
to cmuellner/riscv-toolchain-conventions
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2022
This is essentially a collection of all recent change requests for the -march string: * Relax the ISA string order ([1]) * Add custom extensions ([2]) * Add profiles support ([3]) Most of this patch is based on proposals from Kito Cheng <[email protected]> (see linked resources below). [1] riscv-non-isa#14 [2] riscv-non-isa#1 [3] https://lists.riscv.org/g/sig-toolchains/message/379 [4] riscv-non-isa#11 Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <[email protected]>
apazos
pushed a commit
to apazos/riscv-toolchain-conventions
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2024
Add GDB to release dates and extension support.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The string accepted by
-marchcurrently deviates from the ISA naming strings described in chapter 22 of the RISC-V User ISA manual. Should compilers accept strings in the formmarch=rv32imcXfoobar_Xbazqux, or a more usual-march=rv32imc+foobar+bazqux, or perhaps even-march=rv32imc -mext=+foobar+bazqux(thus separating the extension namespace from other target-specific options that might be specified in-march).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: