Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: remove skipInstalls config option #22648

Merged

Conversation

RahulGautamSingh
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes

  • remove skipInstalls config optin from self-hosted configuration

Context

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh changed the title fix: remove skipInstalls config option feat!: remove skipInstalls config option Jun 9, 2023
@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh added the breaking Breaking change, requires major version bump label Jun 9, 2023
@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2023 00:29
@RahulGautamSingh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't understand the coverage fail. the line is ignored still the codecov asks for coverage.

viceice
viceice previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2023
Copy link
Member

@viceice viceice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like a jest cache issue, do we have a test case for the uncovered line?

@RahulGautamSingh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

looks like a jest cache issue, do we have a test case for the uncovered line?

No

looks like a jest cache issue, do we have a test case for the uncovered line?

We don't have a test case, that's why we use istanbul if for it.

@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh requested a review from viceice June 12, 2023 08:53
@rarkins rarkins dismissed viceice’s stale review June 12, 2023 11:50

The merge-base changed after approval.

@rarkins
Copy link
Collaborator

rarkins commented Jun 12, 2023

@RahulGautamSingh looks like a bad merge - 27 files changed

@rarkins rarkins enabled auto-merge (squash) June 12, 2023 15:14
@rarkins rarkins merged commit e5574c6 into renovatebot:v36 Jun 12, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
rarkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
rarkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
breaking Breaking change, requires major version bump
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants