Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unpin dask and distributed for development and fix merge_labels test #1574

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023

Conversation

galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor

@galipremsagar galipremsagar commented Jun 2, 2023

This PR unpins dask and distributed to >=2023.5.1 for 23.08 development.

xref: rapidsai/cudf#13508

The offending test was using an rmm::device_scalar for some memory that should have been a vector. Not sure how this didn't fail in the past but these changes fix it.

@galipremsagar galipremsagar requested review from a team as code owners June 2, 2023 23:35
@github-actions github-actions bot added the python label Jun 2, 2023
@galipremsagar galipremsagar requested a review from a team as a code owner June 6, 2023 18:16
@github-actions github-actions bot added the cpp label Jun 6, 2023
@galipremsagar galipremsagar changed the title Unpin dask and distributed for development Unpin dask and distributed for development and fix merge_labels test Jun 6, 2023
@galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged changes from #1577, to pass the CI in this PR.

Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cjnolet cjnolet mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2023
@cjnolet cjnolet added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jun 6, 2023
@raydouglass
Copy link
Member

/merge

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Jun 6, 2023

Wow, completely confused why this pytest is suddenly failing only for a single configuration.

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 64f15b6 into rapidsai:branch-23.08 Jun 6, 2023
@galipremsagar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wow, completely confused why this pytest is suddenly failing only for a single configuration.

Looks like third time's a charm, :phew:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cpp improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change python
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants