-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
assert GPU CPU intercept_ equal when fit_intercept is false in cuml.LogisticRegression #5567
Conversation
2800f6c
to
18acacf
Compare
/ok to test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the contribution! I am a bit confused by the test change.
if fit_intercept is False: | ||
assert np.array_equal(culog.intercept_, sklog.intercept_) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought the point of this change was to ensure that intercept_
is equal in both cases. Why are we only testing for equality when fit_intercept is False
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When fit_intercept is True
, intercept_
can be a list of non-zero. It is possible that culog.intercept_ and sklog.intercept_ are different, given their implementations are not exactly the same.
When fit_intercept is False
, intercept_
is a list of zero. The test case is able to assert equal the culog.intercept_ and sklog.intercept_.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But they would still be similar, no? You can use the cuml.testing.utils.array_equal
function like here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Had tried assert array_equal(culog.intercept_, sklog.intercept_, 1e-3, with_sign=True).
Some tests failed:
FAILED tests/test_linear_model.py::test_logistic_regression[column_info0-1000-2-float32-none-1.0-True-1.0-0.001] - AssertionError: assert <array_equal: [0.60477465] [0.6086404] unit_tol=0.001 total_tol=0.0001 with_sign=True>
FAILED tests/test_linear_model.py::test_logistic_regression[column_info0-1000-10-float32-l1-1.0-True-1.0-0.001] - AssertionError: assert <array_equal: [-0.15404558 0.10340142 0.12519604 ... -0.13840534 0.13014889 -0.01927175] [-0.14051172 0.11931933 0.14109698 ... -0.12780005 0.14333196 -0.0074189 ] unit_tol=0.001 t...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mean accuracies of culog and sklog are the same though. It seems the models converged to different optima.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that's a valid point.
18acacf
to
c251293
Compare
/ok to test |
c251293
to
60fd4ec
Compare
d75f99e
to
8e69f1b
Compare
/ok to test |
8e69f1b
to
f284d4f
Compare
if fit_intercept is False: | ||
assert np.array_equal(culog.intercept_, sklog.intercept_) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that's a valid point.
Also adopted the code structure of the SG class to prepare for future PRs. This PR depends on and has included [PR 5567](#5567) Authors: - Jinfeng Li (https://github.com/lijinf2) Approvers: - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd) URL: #5558
Closed this PR because it has been merged as part of the follow-up PR: #5558 |
There is a discrepancy in intercept_ between cuml.linear_model.LogisticRegression and sklearn.linear_model.LogisticRegression. When fit_intercept=False and n_classes > 2, GPU intercept_ has shape (1, ) while CPU intercept_ has shape (n_classes,). This PR revises QN class to resolve the discrepancy.