Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Estimators adaptation toward CPU/GPU interoperability #4918

Merged
merged 68 commits into from
Dec 8, 2022

Conversation

viclafargue
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

viclafargue and others added 30 commits August 18, 2022 11:24
…sai#4862)

Removes possibility of another projects RAPIDS.cmake being used, and removes need to always download a version.

Authors:
  - Robert Maynard (https://github.com/robertmaynard)

Approvers:
  - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd)

URL: rapidsai#4862
For housekeeping, this PR removes unused cuDF imports across a variety of files.

It does not refactor any code that currently relies on cuDF.

Authors:
  - Nick Becker (https://github.com/beckernick)

Approvers:
  - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd)

URL: rapidsai#4873
Import treelite models into FIL in a different precision.

- e.g. load float64 treelite models as a float32 FIL model, or vice versa

Authors:
  - Andy Adinets (https://github.com/canonizer)
  - William Hicks (https://github.com/wphicks)

Approvers:
  - Philip Hyunsu Cho (https://github.com/hcho3)
  - William Hicks (https://github.com/wphicks)

URL: rapidsai#4839
- [x] All points distance membership vector
- [x] All points outlier membership vector
- [x] All points probability in some cluster
- [x] All points membership vector
- [x] Tests

Authors:
  - Tarang Jain (https://github.com/tarang-jain)

Approvers:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

URL: rapidsai#4800
@viclafargue
Copy link
Contributor Author

rerun tests

@wphicks
Copy link
Contributor

wphicks commented Dec 7, 2022

rerun tests

@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Dec 8, 2022

Same issue as other Prs, for some reason the Branch checker job is stuck in a couple of PRs, will work on solving that or admin merging later today

@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Dec 8, 2022

@viclafargue could you merge branch-23.02 into the PR to remove some file diffs that were not changed here?

@viclafargue viclafargue requested review from a team as code owners December 8, 2022 11:29
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-23.02@aba6889). Click here to learn what that means.
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-23.02    #4918   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   79.81%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      184           
  Lines                   ?    11758           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     9385           
  Misses                  ?     2373           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 46.05% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 69.39% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@cjnolet cjnolet removed the request for review from a team December 8, 2022 17:27
@csadorf csadorf added the 5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge label Dec 8, 2022
@wphicks
Copy link
Contributor

wphicks commented Dec 8, 2022

@gpucibot merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge breaking Breaking change Cython / Python Cython or Python issue improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.