Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert #3869 #3933

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 2, 2021
Merged

Revert #3869 #3933

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 2, 2021

Conversation

hcho3
Copy link
Contributor

@hcho3 hcho3 commented Jun 2, 2021

Reverts #3869, as it was shown to reduce the test accuracy in some cases.

Closes #3910

@hcho3 hcho3 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 2, 2021 17:40
@hcho3 hcho3 added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jun 2, 2021
@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Jun 2, 2021

rerun tests

@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Jun 2, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.06@8f6b188). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.06    #3933   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   85.17%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      228           
  Lines                   ?    17933           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    15274           
  Misses                  ?     2659           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 47.81% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 77.44% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8f6b188...3898127. Read the comment docs.

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 42297b5 into rapidsai:branch-21.06 Jun 2, 2021
@hcho3 hcho3 deleted the revert_3869 branch June 3, 2021 02:11
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
Reverts rapidsai#3869, as it was shown to reduce the test accuracy in some cases.

Closes rapidsai#3910

Authors:
  - Philip Hyunsu Cho (https://github.com/hcho3)

Approvers:
  - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd)

URL: rapidsai#3933
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working CUDA/C++ non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] RF : regression in GPU predict accuracy compared to CPU predict and scikit-learn predict
3 participants