You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
After #3869 , some cuml predictions on GPU (FIL) seems to be less accurate than CPU predictions and tends to break tolerance (when set to 2%) of some of the tests in test_random_forest.py.
printing the cuml_acc and fil_acc respectively for each build version after running the above test at this line:
venkywonka
changed the title
[BUG] RF accuracy gap between FIL and RF CPU prediction failing pytest
[BUG] RF : regression in GPU predict accuracy compared to CPU predict and scikit-learn predict
Jun 2, 2021
Describe the bug
After #3869 , some cuml predictions on GPU (FIL) seems to be less accurate than CPU predictions and tends to break tolerance (when set to 2%) of some of the tests in
test_random_forest.py
.printing the
cuml_acc
andfil_acc
respectively for each build version after running the above test at this line:Steps/Code to reproduce bug
pytest cuml/python/cuml/test/test_random_forest.py --run_quality --run_stress --run_unit -v
or this particular test:
pytest $CUML_PATH/python/cuml/test/test_random_forest.py::test_rf_classification[small_clf0-auto-1-float32-0.9] -v --run_quality -- run_stress --run_unit
Expected behavior
tests expected to pass
Environment details (please complete the following information):
cmake
&gcc/g++
and commit hash of build:92484fb99aa390dc24aeb86a67abf259bfaadf55
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: