-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add test for map column metadata handling in ORC writer #9852
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-22.02 #9852 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 10.49% 10.40% -0.09%
================================================
Files 119 119
Lines 20305 20503 +198
================================================
+ Hits 2130 2134 +4
- Misses 18175 18369 +194
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Look good, except some nit in coding style that can be rewritten to be cleaner/nicer.
@@ -41,6 +42,22 @@ using column_wrapper = | |||
typename std::conditional<std::is_same_v<T, cudf::string_view>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, this is clever. Need to remember this one.
BUILD_EXPORT_SET cudf-exports INSTALL_EXPORT_SET cudf-exports PATCH_COMMAND patch | ||
--reject-file=- -p1 -N < ${CUDF_SOURCE_DIR}/cmake/libcudacxx.patch || true | ||
BUILD_EXPORT_SET cudf-exports | ||
INSTALL_EXPORT_SET cudf-exports PATCH_COMMAND patch --reject-file=- -p1 -N < |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not familiar with the syntax used in cmake
files. Should there be a \
at the end to indicate continuation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No idea, this is a style fix when the checker version changed. Merged trunk so these changes are gone from the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor nitpicks/questions.
…missing-orc-map-test
@gpucibot merge |
Expands existing ORC test to cover the fix merged in #9782
Test now has struct column nested in a map column, so that the propagation of names of the leaf columns (struct column field names in ORC) can be tested. The test segfaults without the fix in #9782