Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

patch thrust to fix intmax num elements limitation in scan_by_key #8199

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 11, 2021

Conversation

cwharris
Copy link
Contributor

@cwharris cwharris commented May 10, 2021

same fix seen here, but via patch: NVIDIA/thrust#1424

Also fixes rapidsai/cuspatial#393

Alternatively, we could wait and update our thrust version, rather than patching the existing one.

@cwharris cwharris requested a review from a team as a code owner May 10, 2021 20:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added CMake CMake build issue libcudf Affects libcudf (C++/CUDA) code. labels May 10, 2021
@cwharris cwharris added bug Something isn't working and removed CMake CMake build issue labels May 10, 2021
@cwharris cwharris requested a review from davidwendt May 10, 2021 20:25
@cwharris cwharris added the non-breaking Non-breaking change label May 10, 2021
@cwharris cwharris requested a review from trxcllnt May 10, 2021 20:25
@github-actions github-actions bot added the CMake CMake build issue label May 11, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #8199 (5207afb) into branch-0.20 (51336df) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           branch-0.20    #8199      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        82.88%   82.88%   -0.01%     
===============================================
  Files              103      104       +1     
  Lines            17668    17907     +239     
===============================================
+ Hits             14645    14843     +198     
- Misses            3023     3064      +41     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
python/cudf/cudf/core/tools/datetimes.py 80.42% <0.00%> (-4.11%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/decimal.py 90.20% <0.00%> (-2.72%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/datetime.py 88.03% <0.00%> (-1.88%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/struct.py 94.73% <0.00%> (-1.56%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/utils/dtypes.py 82.20% <0.00%> (-1.24%) ⬇️
python/dask_cudf/dask_cudf/groupby.py 91.28% <0.00%> (-0.88%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/series.py 91.17% <0.00%> (-0.56%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/index.py 92.52% <0.00%> (-0.55%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/column.py 88.20% <0.00%> (-0.44%) ⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/lists.py 86.98% <0.00%> (-0.43%) ⬇️
... and 28 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9328c56...5207afb. Read the comment docs.

@harrism
Copy link
Member

harrism commented May 11, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit ae08422 into rapidsai:branch-0.20 May 11, 2021
cwharris added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2021
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2021
…_key" (#8263)

Reverts #8199

According to @allisonvacanti (NVIDIA/thrust#1424 (comment)) this patch will likely have adverse effect on performance. We should revert it until a better solution can be found.

Authors:
  - Christopher Harris (https://github.com/cwharris)

Approvers:
  - David Wendt (https://github.com/davidwendt)
  - Keith Kraus (https://github.com/kkraus14)
  - Elias Stehle (https://github.com/elstehle)

URL: #8263
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working CMake CMake build issue libcudf Affects libcudf (C++/CUDA) code. non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Hausdorff fails with OOM for > intmax num inputs
3 participants