Support listConcatenateByRows in Java package [skip ci]

[sperlingxx]

Current PR is to provide Java API for cudf::lists::concatenate_rows, which is added in #8049.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #8171 (accd7f4) into branch-0.20 (51336df) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head accd7f4 differs from pull request most recent head c009727. Consider uploading reports for the commit c009727 to get more accurate results

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           branch-0.20    #8171      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        82.88%   82.86%   -0.03%     
===============================================
  Files              103      104       +1     
  Lines            17668    17884     +216     
===============================================
+ Hits             14645    14820     +175     
- Misses            3023     3064      +41     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
python/cudf/cudf/_fuzz_testing/parquet.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/_fuzz_testing/utils.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/abc.py	91.66% <ø> (+0.17%)	⬆️
python/cudf/cudf/core/algorithms.py	82.35% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/categorical.py	92.37% <ø> (+0.13%)	⬆️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/column.py	88.20% <ø> (-0.44%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/tools/datetimes.py	80.42% <0.00%> (-4.11%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/decimal.py	91.04% <0.00%> (-1.89%)	⬇️
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/datetime.py	88.03% <0.00%> (-1.88%)	⬇️
... and 35 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4715c83...c009727. Read the comment docs.

[revans2]

I had the exact same comments as @jlowe

[sperlingxx]

Hi @jlowe, thanks for review. I've addressed the problems you pointed out. And I made similar modifications on ColumnVector.stringConcatenate.

[sperlingxx]

I think we should NOT merge this PR until the native fix getting merged.

[revans2]

@gpucibot merge

[revans2]

I think we should NOT merge this PR until the native fix getting merged.

Sorry I missed this. Generally if something should not be merged we should mark it as a draft PR.