-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use less _is_categorical_dtype #15148
Use less _is_categorical_dtype #15148
Conversation
# TODO: Remove this work-around Dictionary types | ||
# in libcudf are fully mapped to categorical columns: | ||
# https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf/issues/3960 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This linked issue has been resolved. Is there an action to be taken here (i.e. removal of the workaround)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It appears although the issue is closed, the latest PR that addressed this function notes that it's still awaiting libcudf handling of category type (#12571 (comment)) so I think this is still needed
…ke/cudf into rm/_is_categorical_dtype
In bd7c126 I added a carve-out for |
Co-authored-by: GALI PREM SAGAR <[email protected]>
/merge |
Description
Rehash of #14942
Checklist