Fix warnings from pandas in test_array_ufunc.py.

[bdice]

This PR hides pandas warnings in test_array_ufunc.py. (I am working through one test file at a time so we can enable -Werr in the future.) These warnings come from specific functions like arccos for which the provided integer inputs are out-of-range. It is fine for us to hide these warnings because they do not come from cudf.

Alternatives and why I chose against them:

• Why not limit the test data input to be in the domain of the ufunc? Limiting data inputs would hide the warning. However, it would decrease our coverage that ensures cudf and pandas agree on those results for values outside the domain of the ufunc (particularly trigonometric functions). It would additionally require inputs to be generated based on the ufunc, which would be lengthy.
• Why not make cudf raise a warning and ensure that pandas/cudf agree on warning behavior? I chose against this because we generally avoid data introspection in cudf, and this would involve a significantly more complex approach to ufunc execution.

[vyasr]

Lol when I merged these changes I definitely wondered whether you would find these as part of your warnings hunt before I could get around to fixing them once I finalize ufuncs. Thanks for the fix.

Is there a message regex that we could use in filterwarnings to ensure that we only catch the expected warnings (out of range args for inverse sin functions, etc)? Not a must, just a suggestion if it's easy. I don't remember exactly what warnings come up but I believe that all the functions that you have put into the list are domain errors.

[bdice]

@vyasr In bb18841, I catch specific warning messages.

I just started at this file because it was alphabetically first -- not trying to interfere with your ufunc work! 😋

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #10324 (bb18841) into branch-22.04 (a7d88cd) will increase coverage by 0.21%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           branch-22.04   #10324      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         10.42%   10.63%   +0.21%     
================================================
  Files               119      122       +3     
  Lines             20603    20940     +337     
================================================
+ Hits               2148     2228      +80     
- Misses            18455    18712     +257     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
python/cudf/cudf/_fuzz_testing/fuzzer.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/_fuzz_testing/io.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/_fuzz_testing/main.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/_version.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/comm/gpuarrow.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/_base_index.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/categorical.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/column.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/datetime.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
python/cudf/cudf/core/column/methods.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 56 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fdad597...bb18841. Read the comment docs.

[bdice]

@gpucibot merge