-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG]Decimal128 OverflowError BUG? #11337
Comments
It looks like the result type is too large to fit in Decimal128. Would silently overflowing in this situation would be preferable over raising an OverflowError? For all other data types, we (and Pandas) do silently overflow. |
I think silently overflowing in Decimal128 type will be preferable over raising an Error. Hope to make the improvement in the Decimal128 type. |
This issue has been labeled |
Fixes: #11337 - [x] This PR removes raising of an overflow error and rather let's the data overflow similar to what we do with other numeric dtypes. Authors: - GALI PREM SAGAR (https://github.com/galipremsagar) Approvers: - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr) - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice) URL: #12063
BUG EXAMPlE:
Is there any solution to avoid the OverflowError when doing math operations like this above?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: