Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.5.z] Backports and bump of Quarkus to 3.15.2 #1416

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

jedla97
Copy link
Member

@jedla97 jedla97 commented Nov 25, 2024

Summary

Backport of:

Also bumping the Quarkus version to 3.15.2 in pom and CI

Please check the relevant options

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Dependency update
  • Refactoring
  • Backport
  • Release (follows conventions described in the RELEASE.md)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

  • Example scenarios has been updated / added
  • Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
  • Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

@jedla97
Copy link
Member Author

jedla97 commented Nov 25, 2024

run tests

@jedla97 jedla97 requested a review from jcarranzan November 25, 2024 19:07
@jedla97
Copy link
Member Author

jedla97 commented Nov 25, 2024

The OCP JVm error is not caused by this PR, checked on both clusters 2 times and passed every time

Copy link
Contributor

@jcarranzan jcarranzan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Backports and the bump to 3.15.2 looks good to me

@jcarranzan jcarranzan merged commit 7a56fec into quarkus-qe:1.5.z Nov 26, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@jedla97 jedla97 mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2024
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants