-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-77607: Improve accuracy of os.path.join docs #101406
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a follow-up to python#100811. One of the changes in that PR isn't accurate in that `os.path.join('', '')` will not end in a separator. This reverts that change to the previous wording that used "only", but explicitly calls out the case where the last part ends in a separator, which is what caused confusin in python#77607 and motivated the change in python#100811.
slateny
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks 🙂
hauntsaninja
added
needs backport to 3.10
only security fixes
needs backport to 3.11
only security fixes
labels
Jan 30, 2023
Thanks @hauntsaninja for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2023
This is a follow-up to pythonGH-100811. One of the changes in that PR isn't accurate in that `os.path.join('', '')` will not end in a separator. This reverts that change to the previous wording that used "only", but explicitly calls out the case where the last part ends in a separator, which is what caused confusin in pythonGH-77607 and motivated the change in pythonGH-100811. (cherry picked from commit 909a674) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
GH-101451 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2023
This is a follow-up to pythonGH-100811. One of the changes in that PR isn't accurate in that `os.path.join('', '')` will not end in a separator. This reverts that change to the previous wording that used "only", but explicitly calls out the case where the last part ends in a separator, which is what caused confusin in pythonGH-77607 and motivated the change in pythonGH-100811. (cherry picked from commit 909a674) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
GH-101452 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2023
This is a follow-up to GH-100811. One of the changes in that PR isn't accurate in that `os.path.join('', '')` will not end in a separator. This reverts that change to the previous wording that used "only", but explicitly calls out the case where the last part ends in a separator, which is what caused confusin in GH-77607 and motivated the change in GH-100811. (cherry picked from commit 909a674) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2023
This is a follow-up to GH-100811. One of the changes in that PR isn't accurate in that `os.path.join('', '')` will not end in a separator. This reverts that change to the previous wording that used "only", but explicitly calls out the case where the last part ends in a separator, which is what caused confusin in GH-77607 and motivated the change in GH-100811. (cherry picked from commit 909a674) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
mdboom
pushed a commit
to mdboom/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2023
This is a follow-up to python#100811. One of the changes in that PR isn't accurate in that `os.path.join('', '')` will not end in a separator. This reverts that change to the previous wording that used "only", but explicitly calls out the case where the last part ends in a separator, which is what caused confusin in python#77607 and motivated the change in python#100811.
carljm
added a commit
to carljm/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2023
* main: pythongh-101440: fix json snippet error in logging-cookbook.rst (python#101439) pythongh-99276 - Updated Doc/faq/general.rst (python#101396) Add JOBS parameter to docs Makefile (python#101395) pythongh-98831: rewrite GET_LEN, GET_ITER, BEFORE_WITH and a few simple opcodes in the instruction definition DSL (python#101443) pythongh-77607: Improve accuracy of os.path.join docs (python#101406) Fixes typo in asyncio.TaskGroup context manager code example (python#101449) pythongh-98831: Clean up and add cache size static_assert to macro (python#101442) pythongh-99955: use SUCCESS/ERROR return values in optimizer and assembler. Use RETURN_IF_ERROR where appropriate. Fix a couple of bugs. (python#101412)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a follow-up to #100811.
One of the changes in that PR isn't accurate in that
os.path.join('', '')
will not end in a separator.This reverts that change to the previous wording that used "only", but explicitly calls out the case where the last part ends in a separator, which is what caused confusion in #77607 and motivated the change in #100811.