-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 528
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider a better structure for HTTP headers #210
Labels
Comments
aaugustin
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2017
Since this part is hacky and likely to change in the future (#210), wrap it into a single function and add tests for the public API we really care about.
aaugustin
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2017
Since this part is hacky and likely to change in the future (#210), wrap it into a single function and add tests for the public API we really care about.
aaugustin
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2017
Since this part is hacky and likely to change in the future (#210), wrap it into a single function and add tests for the public API we really care about.
Not sure we're going to do this. I may end up as wontfix. |
aaugustin
changed the title
Consider a more lightweight structure for HTTP headers
Consider a better structure for HTTP headers
Sep 30, 2017
I did reinvent a multi-value dict in #423 🤷♂️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Follow up on a suggestion by @cjerdonek here: #200 (comment)
Currently websockets relies
http.client.HTTPMessage
because:email.message.EmailMessage
type;http.client.HTTPMessage
is also available in the stdlib, more appropriate, and API-compatible (it's a thin subclass)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: