-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Worker: Use generator functions to reduce memory load #719
Conversation
We should find a way to check what is actually causing the memory increase. I cannot image that keeping the lists around that store the job ids actually cause a significant memory penalty unless your are submitted upwards of 1e9 jobs. My feeling is rather the we have a memory leak somewhere when running jobs and should look into this, maybe something like this old issue. |
So my issue is that the worker runs into a memory issue when running with 510 jobs. I am not exactly sure if this is the main process of the worker or the sum of sub process. I looked into different spawn methods but that did not help. I also tried to only execute the executable in the subprocess #722 . |
|
Unfortunately the |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
No description provided.