Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Queuing system submission: check if the job is already waiting in the queue or currently running. #499

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Nov 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced file handling with the addition of check_file_exists and get_queue_id functionalities.
    • Default execution function in FileExecutor updated to improve task execution behavior.
    • New parameter file_name added to multiple functions for better task management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for file existence checks and job submissions.
  • Documentation

    • Updated function signatures and docstrings to reflect new parameters and functionalities.
  • Refactor

    • Updated import paths for better module organization.
  • Tests

    • Adjusted import statements in test files to align with the new module structure without altering test logic.
    • Added tests for check_file_exists and functionality related to queue_id.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve refactoring import paths and modifying the FileExecutor class's initialization parameters. The default execution function for the FileExecutor has been updated, and several functions related to file handling and job execution have been enhanced. New checks for file existence and queue ID retrieval have been introduced, along with updates to the handling of command parameters. These alterations affect how tasks are executed within the caching mechanism and improve error handling and resource management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
executorlib/cache/executor.py Updated import paths for execute_in_subprocess and execute_with_pysqa. Changed default execute_function in FileExecutor from execute_in_subprocess to execute_with_pysqa.
executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py Modified execute_with_pysqa to accept a list for command, added file_name parameter, and changed return type to Tuple[int, int]. Introduced check_file_exists and get_queue_id functions.
executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py Updated execute_in_subprocess signature to include file_name. Added call to check_file_exists.
executorlib/standalone/hdf.py Enhanced dump function to include queue_id, added get_queue_id function to retrieve queue ID from HDF5 file.
executorlib/standalone/inputcheck.py Added check_file_exists function to verify file existence and raise errors if not found.
tests/test_cache_executor_mpi.py Updated import for execute_in_subprocess to reflect new path. No other changes to test logic.
tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py Updated import paths for execute_in_subprocess and terminate_subprocess. Added test for create_file_executor error handling.
tests/test_pysqa_subprocess.py Updated import for _pysqa_execute_command to new path. No changes to test logic.
executorlib/cache/shared.py Added file_name parameter to execute_tasks_h5. Updated FutureItem.result method to use self._file_name.
tests/test_cache_hdf.py Added tests for get_queue_id and updated test_hdf_kwargs to include queue_id.
tests/test_shared_input_check.py Introduced test_check_file_exists method to validate check_file_exists function.

Possibly related PRs

  • Remove conda support in executorlib #418: The main PR refactors import paths and modifies the FileExecutor class, which is relevant to the changes in the executorlib/cache/executor.py file in this PR, as it also involves modifications to the FileExecutor class.
  • Move cache functionality to shared #434: This PR involves moving cache functionality, which may relate to the changes in the executorlib/cache/executor.py file where the FileExecutor class is modified.
  • Split shared cache in backend and frontend #443: The changes in this PR involve cache functionality, which is relevant to the modifications in the executorlib/cache/executor.py file where the FileExecutor class is updated.
  • Cache: Terminate processes when closing executor #447: This PR introduces a termination function in the FileExecutor class, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the FileExecutor.
  • Implement resource_dict for file executor #456: The introduction of the resource_dict in the FileExecutor class is relevant to the changes in the main PR, which also modifies the FileExecutor to utilize a similar structure.
  • Cache: create method #459: The addition of the create_file_executor function in this PR is related to the changes in the FileExecutor class in the main PR, as both involve enhancements to executor functionality.
  • Add additional tests to improve coverage #464: The addition of tests for the execute_in_subprocess function in this PR is relevant to the changes in the main PR, which also involves modifications to the FileExecutor and its associated functions.

🐰 In the meadow, changes sprout,
With paths anew, there's no doubt.
FileExecutor's dance now refined,
Queue IDs and checks intertwined.
HDF5 holds secrets, neat and tight,
In this code, all feels just right! 🌼

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jan-janssen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cee811e and 8a06907.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 9

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
tests/test_cache_executor_mpi.py (1)

Line range hint 1-47: Add test coverage for queue checking functionality.

While the existing tests cover MPI execution, there's no test coverage for the new queue checking functionality mentioned in the PR title (checking if jobs are already waiting/running).

Would you like me to help create test cases that verify:

  1. Detection of already queued jobs
  2. Detection of currently running jobs
  3. Proper handling of duplicate job submissions

This would help ensure the new functionality works as intended.

tests/test_pysqa_subprocess.py (1)

Line range hint 13-45: Add test coverage for queue checking functionality

The test suite currently lacks coverage for the main PR objective: checking if jobs are already waiting in the queue or currently running. While the existing command execution tests are valuable, we should add test cases for:

  1. Detecting jobs already in queue
  2. Detecting currently running jobs
  3. Edge cases in queue status checking

Would you like me to help create test cases for these scenarios? I can provide a template with test methods covering:

  • Job already exists in queue
  • Job is currently running
  • Queue checking with invalid job IDs
  • Edge cases (empty queue, multiple matches, etc.)
executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py (4)

1-6: Remove unused import

The os.path import is not used in this file and can be safely removed.

-import os.path
import subprocess
import time
from typing import Optional

from executorlib.standalone.inputcheck import check_file_exists
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

1-1: os.path imported but unused

Remove unused import: os.path

(F401)


Line range hint 10-17: Fix mutable default argument

Using an empty list as a default argument can lead to unexpected behavior because it's mutable and shared between function calls. Use None as the default and initialize the list inside the function.

def execute_in_subprocess(
    command: list,
-   task_dependent_lst: list = [],
+   task_dependent_lst: Optional[list] = None,
    file_name: Optional[str] = None,
    resource_dict: Optional[dict] = None,
    config_directory: Optional[str] = None,
    backend: Optional[str] = None,
    cache_directory: Optional[str] = None,
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

1-1: os.path imported but unused

Remove unused import: os.path

(F401)


11-11: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)


24-24: Consider adding type validation for HDF5 files

The docstring specifies that file_name should be an HDF5 file, but this isn't enforced in the type hints or validation. Consider adding a custom type or validation to ensure the correct file type.


Line range hint 9-56: Implementation doesn't fully address PR objectives

The PR's objective is to "check if the job is already waiting in the queue or currently running", but the current changes only implement file existence checking. Consider adding queue status verification before spawning a new subprocess.

Some considerations for implementation:

  1. Track running processes in a shared state
  2. Add queue status verification before process creation
  3. Handle cases where duplicate jobs are detected

Would you like me to help design and implement the queue verification functionality?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

1-1: os.path imported but unused

Remove unused import: os.path

(F401)


11-11: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)

executorlib/standalone/hdf.py (2)

21-21: Consider adding type validation for queue_id

While the addition of queue_id storage is good, the dump function should validate that the queue_id is an integer when present in the data_dict to maintain data consistency.

Consider adding validation before storing:

 def dump(file_name: str, data_dict: dict) -> None:
+    if "queue_id" in data_dict and not isinstance(data_dict["queue_id"], (int, type(None))):
+        raise TypeError("queue_id must be an integer or None")
     group_dict = {

Line range hint 1-81: Consider implementing a context manager for HDF5 file operations

The file contains multiple functions that handle HDF5 file operations with similar patterns. To improve maintainability and ensure consistent error handling, consider implementing a context manager class that encapsulates the common HDF5 file operations.

This would:

  1. Centralize error handling
  2. Ensure consistent file access patterns
  3. Reduce code duplication
  4. Make it easier to add new operations in the future

Example structure:

class HDF5Handler:
    def __init__(self, file_name: str):
        self.file_name = file_name

    def __enter__(self):
        self.file = h5py.File(self.file_name, "a")
        return self

    def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb):
        self.file.close()

    def get_queue_id(self) -> Optional[int]:
        # Implementation here

    def dump(self, data_dict: dict) -> None:
        # Implementation here
executorlib/cache/executor.py (1)

Line range hint 27-33: Document the queue checking behavior

Since the executor now uses execute_with_pysqa by default, which presumably includes queue checking functionality, this behavior should be documented in the class docstring.

Add information about queue checking to the docstring:

 def __init__(
     self,
     cache_directory: str = "cache",
     resource_dict: Optional[dict] = None,
     execute_function: callable = execute_with_pysqa,
     terminate_function: Optional[callable] = None,
     pysqa_config_directory: Optional[str] = None,
     backend: Optional[str] = None,
     disable_dependencies: bool = False,
 ):
     """
     Initialize the FileExecutor.
 
     Args:
         cache_directory (str, optional): The directory to store cache files. Defaults to "cache".
         resource_dict (dict): A dictionary of resources required by the task. With the following keys:
                           - cores (int): number of MPI cores to be used for each function call
                           - cwd (str/None): current working directory where the parallel python task is executed
         execute_function (callable, optional): The function to execute tasks. Defaults to execute_with_pysqa.
+            When using execute_with_pysqa, it checks if the job is already waiting in the queue
+            or currently running to prevent duplicate submissions.
         terminate_function (callable, optional): The function to terminate the tasks.
         pysqa_config_directory (str, optional): path to the pysqa config directory (only for pysqa based backend).
         backend (str, optional): name of the backend used to spawn tasks.
         disable_dependencies (boolean): Disable resolving future objects during the submission.
     """
tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (2)

Line range hint 142-146: Add test coverage for queue state verification

Given the PR objective to "check if the job is already waiting in the queue or currently running", consider adding test cases to verify:

  1. Detection of already queued jobs
  2. Detection of currently running jobs
  3. Queue state verification

Example test structure:

def test_detect_queued_job(self):
    with FileExecutor(execute_function=execute_in_subprocess) as exe:
        # Submit first job
        fs1 = exe.submit(my_funct, 1, b=2)
        # Attempt to submit identical job
        fs2 = exe.submit(my_funct, 1, b=2)
        # Verify queue detection behavior

def test_detect_running_job(self):
    with FileExecutor(execute_function=execute_in_subprocess) as exe:
        # Submit long-running job
        fs1 = exe.submit(time.sleep, 2)
        # Verify job is detected as running
        # Attempt to submit identical job
        # Verify running job detection behavior

Would you like me to help implement these test cases or create a GitHub issue to track this task?


Line range hint 147-150: Enhance error handling test coverage

The current error handling tests only cover basic validation. Consider adding test cases for queue-related error scenarios:

  1. Invalid queue states
  2. Queue connection errors
  3. Queue submission failures

Example test structure:

def test_queue_error_handling(self):
    with FileExecutor(execute_function=execute_in_subprocess) as exe:
        # Test invalid queue configuration
        with self.assertRaises(QueueConfigError):
            exe.submit(my_funct, 1, b=2, queue_config={'invalid': 'config'})
            
        # Test queue connection failure
        with self.assertRaises(QueueConnectionError):
            exe.submit(my_funct, 1, b=2, queue_endpoint='invalid_endpoint')
            
        # Test queue submission failure
        with self.assertRaises(QueueSubmissionError):
            exe.submit(my_funct, 1, b=2, queue_params={'invalid': 'params'})
executorlib/standalone/inputcheck.py (1)

192-193: Remove extra blank lines

There are two consecutive blank lines before the function definition, which is inconsistent with the rest of the file.

-

-
def check_file_exists(file_name: str):
+
def check_file_exists(file_name: str):
executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py (2)

12-15: Improve type annotations for clarity and consistency

To enhance readability and follow best practices, use type hints from the typing module. Replace built-in types with those from typing, and ensure consistency across annotations.

Apply this diff to update the type annotations:

 from typing import List, Optional, Tuple, Union

 def execute_with_pysqa(
-    command: list,
-    task_dependent_lst: list[int] = [],
+    command: List[str],
+    task_dependent_lst: Optional[List[int]] = None,
     file_name: Optional[str] = None,
-    resource_dict: Optional[dict] = None,
+    resource_dict: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
     ...
 ):
+    if task_dependent_lst is None:
+        task_dependent_lst = []

Ensure you import any additional types like Dict and Any from the typing module.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

13-13: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)


Line range hint 23-36: Update the docstrings to reflect optional parameters and default values

Some parameters are marked as optional in the function signature but are not indicated as such in the docstrings. Additionally, default values have changed and should be documented accordingly.

Modify the docstrings for clarity:

 Args:
     command (list): The command to be executed.
-    task_dependent_lst (list): A list of subprocesses that the current subprocess depends on. Defaults to [].
+    task_dependent_lst (list, optional): A list of subprocesses that the current subprocess depends on. Defaults to None.
+    file_name (str, optional): Name of the HDF5 file which contains the Python function.
+    resource_dict (dict, optional): Resource dictionary defining execution resources.
     config_directory (str, optional): Path to the config directory.
     backend (str, optional): Name of the backend used to spawn tasks.
     cache_directory (str, optional): The directory to store the HDF5 files.
 
 Returns:
-    int: queuing system ID
+    int: Queuing system ID.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

13-13: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76ccca9 and a70682e.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • executorlib/cache/executor.py (2 hunks)
  • executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py (2 hunks)
  • executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py (3 hunks)
  • executorlib/standalone/hdf.py (3 hunks)
  • executorlib/standalone/inputcheck.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_cache_executor_mpi.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_pysqa_subprocess.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py

13-13: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)

executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py

1-1: os.path imported but unused

Remove unused import: os.path

(F401)


11-11: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/test_pysqa_subprocess.py (1)

4-4: Verify consistent import path updates across the codebase

The import path has been updated from executorlib.standalone.cache.queue to executorlib.cache.queue_spawner, which appears to be part of a module reorganization.

Let's verify that all imports have been consistently updated:

✅ Verification successful

The results show that the old import path is not found anywhere in the codebase, and the new import path is consistently used in two files: the test file and executorlib/cache/executor.py. Let me verify the module structure to ensure this reorganization is complete.


Import path changes are consistent with module reorganization

The verification confirms:

  • The old module path executorlib.standalone.cache.queue has been completely removed
  • The new module queue_spawner.py exists at the correct location
  • Only two files use the new import path, and they do so consistently
  • No lingering references to the old path exist in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify new import usage
# Expected: No occurrences of old import path, consistent usage of new path

# Check for any remaining old import paths
echo "Checking for old import paths..."
rg "from executorlib.standalone.cache.queue import"

# Check usage of new import path
echo "Checking new import path usage..."
rg "from executorlib.cache.queue_spawner import"

Length of output: 455


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the old module structure exists and verify the new module structure
echo "Checking module structure..."
fd -t f -p "executorlib/standalone/cache/queue*"
echo "Checking new module location..."
fd -t f -p "executorlib/cache/queue_spawner*"

# Check for any other potential references to the old path
echo "Checking for any other references to old path..."
rg "executorlib.standalone.cache.queue"

Length of output: 420

executorlib/cache/executor.py (2)

6-8: LGTM: Import path refactoring

The import path changes look good, moving from standalone.cache to the main cache package improves the module organization.


20-23: Verify queue checking implementation in queue_spawner

The PR aims to check for duplicate jobs in the queue, but the actual implementation of this check would be in the execute_with_pysqa function. Let's verify its implementation.

tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (1)

7-10: Verify consistent import path updates across the codebase

The import path has been updated from executorlib.standalone.cache.spawner to executorlib.cache.subprocess_spawner. Let's ensure this change is consistent across all files.

✅ Verification successful

The results show that the old import path executorlib.standalone.cache.spawner is not found anywhere in the codebase, while the new import path executorlib.cache.subprocess_spawner is consistently used in three files. Let me verify if these are all the relevant files that should have this import by checking for usage of the imported functions.


Import path changes are consistent and complete

The import path change from executorlib.standalone.cache.spawner to executorlib.cache.subprocess_spawner is correctly implemented across the codebase. The verification shows:

  • No instances of the old import path remain
  • The new import path is used in all files that need these functions
  • The functions are defined in executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py and used appropriately in test files
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify new import paths
# are used consistently across the codebase

echo "Checking for old import paths..."
rg "from executorlib.standalone.cache.spawner import"

echo "Verifying new import paths..."
rg "from executorlib.cache.subprocess_spawner import"

Length of output: 527


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage of execute_in_subprocess and terminate_subprocess functions
echo "Checking for execute_in_subprocess usage..."
rg "execute_in_subprocess\(" -A 2

echo -e "\nChecking for terminate_subprocess usage..."
rg "terminate_subprocess\(" -A 2

Length of output: 1070

executorlib/standalone/inputcheck.py (2)

3-3: LGTM!

The addition of os.path import is appropriate for the new file existence checking functionality.


194-198: Verify integration with queue checking functionality

While the function correctly implements file existence checking, let's verify how it integrates with the queue checking functionality mentioned in the PR title.

✅ Verification successful

Let's gather more information about how check_file_exists is used in the queue-related context.


Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:

Function properly integrates with queue checking functionality

The check_file_exists function is correctly integrated into the queue system:

  • Used in queue_spawner.py to validate input files before getting queue IDs
  • Part of the workflow where job status is checked via qa.get_status_of_job(process_id=queue_id)
  • Serves as a prerequisite validation step before queue operations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how check_file_exists is used in queue-related code

# Search for references to check_file_exists in queue-related files
echo "Searching for check_file_exists usage in queue-related files:"
rg -l "check_file_exists" | grep -i "queue"

# Search for queue status checking logic
echo -e "\nSearching for queue status checking implementation:"
rg -l "queue" | xargs rg -l "status|running|waiting"

Length of output: 668


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation in queue_spawner.py and its usage of check_file_exists
echo "Content of queue_spawner.py showing check_file_exists usage:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "check_file_exists" executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py

echo -e "\nQueue status checking implementation in queue_spawner.py:"
rg -A 10 "status|running|waiting" executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py

echo -e "\nContent of standalone/queue.py for queue status logic:"
rg -A 10 "status|running|waiting" executorlib/standalone/queue.py

Length of output: 2182

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
import shutil
import unittest

from executorlib.standalone.cache.spawner import execute_in_subprocess
from executorlib.cache.subprocess_spawner import execute_in_subprocess
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Import path refactoring needs attention

The verification revealed mixed results regarding the import path refactoring:

  • The new path executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py exists and contains the required execute_in_subprocess function
  • However, the module still imports from the old path: from executorlib.standalone.inputcheck import check_file_exists
  • Many files (27+) are still using imports from executorlib.standalone

This suggests the refactoring is incomplete and needs to be addressed consistently across the codebase.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Verify import path refactoring.

The import path update aligns with the module restructuring.

Let's verify the new import path exists and the old one is fully removed:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify import path refactoring is complete
# Expected: New path should exist, old path should be removed

# Check if new module exists
fd -e py "subprocess_spawner.py" executorlib/cache/

# Verify old module is removed
fd -e py "spawner.py" executorlib/standalone/cache/

# Check for any remaining references to old path
rg "executorlib\.standalone\.cache\.spawner"

Length of output: 307


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the import path changes more thoroughly

# 1. Check the content of the new module to ensure it has the required function
echo "=== Content of new subprocess_spawner.py ==="
cat executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py

# 2. Search for any other files still using old import path pattern
echo -e "\n=== Files with old import pattern ==="
rg -l "from executorlib.standalone"

# 3. Check if there are any other references to the old path structure
echo -e "\n=== References to standalone in paths ==="
rg "standalone.*cache"

# 4. Verify the function is actually used in the test file
echo -e "\n=== Usage in test file ==="
cat tests/test_cache_executor_mpi.py

Length of output: 4882

Comment on lines +76 to +81
def get_queue_id(file_name: str) -> Optional[int]:
with h5py.File(file_name, "r") as hdf:
if "queue_id" in hdf:
return cloudpickle.loads(np.void(hdf["/queue_id"]))
else:
return None
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add documentation and improve error handling

The new function needs documentation and should handle potential file access errors consistently with other functions in this module.

Consider these improvements:

 def get_queue_id(file_name: str) -> Optional[int]:
+    """
+    Retrieve the queue ID from the HDF5 file if available
+
+    Args:
+        file_name (str): file name of the HDF5 file as absolute path
+
+    Returns:
+        Optional[int]: queue ID if available, None otherwise
+
+    Raises:
+        OSError: If the file cannot be accessed
+        TypeError: If the stored queue_id is not an integer
+    """
     with h5py.File(file_name, "r") as hdf:
         if "queue_id" in hdf:
-            return cloudpickle.loads(np.void(hdf["/queue_id"]))
+            queue_id = cloudpickle.loads(np.void(hdf["/queue_id"]))
+            if not isinstance(queue_id, (int, type(None))):
+                raise TypeError("Stored queue_id must be an integer or None")
+            return queue_id
         else:
             return None
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def get_queue_id(file_name: str) -> Optional[int]:
with h5py.File(file_name, "r") as hdf:
if "queue_id" in hdf:
return cloudpickle.loads(np.void(hdf["/queue_id"]))
else:
return None
def get_queue_id(file_name: str) -> Optional[int]:
"""
Retrieve the queue ID from the HDF5 file if available
Args:
file_name (str): file name of the HDF5 file as absolute path
Returns:
Optional[int]: queue ID if available, None otherwise
Raises:
OSError: If the file cannot be accessed
TypeError: If the stored queue_id is not an integer
"""
with h5py.File(file_name, "r") as hdf:
if "queue_id" in hdf:
queue_id = cloudpickle.loads(np.void(hdf["/queue_id"]))
if not isinstance(queue_id, (int, type(None))):
raise TypeError("Stored queue_id must be an integer or None")
return queue_id
else:
return None

Comment on lines +194 to +198
def check_file_exists(file_name: str):
if file_name is None:
raise ValueError("file_name is not set.")
if not os.path.exists(file_name):
raise ValueError("file_name is not written to the file system.")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add type hints and improve error messages

The function should follow Python typing best practices and provide more descriptive error messages.

-def check_file_exists(file_name: str):
+def check_file_exists(file_name: str) -> None:
     if file_name is None:
-        raise ValueError("file_name is not set.")
+        raise ValueError("The file_name parameter must not be None.")
     if not os.path.exists(file_name):
-        raise ValueError("file_name is not written to the file system.")
+        raise ValueError(f"The file '{file_name}' does not exist in the file system.")

The changes:

  1. Added return type annotation to match other validation functions
  2. Improved error messages to be more descriptive and include the actual filename in the error
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def check_file_exists(file_name: str):
if file_name is None:
raise ValueError("file_name is not set.")
if not os.path.exists(file_name):
raise ValueError("file_name is not written to the file system.")
def check_file_exists(file_name: str) -> None:
if file_name is None:
raise ValueError("The file_name parameter must not be None.")
if not os.path.exists(file_name):
raise ValueError(f"The file '{file_name}' does not exist in the file system.")

config_directory: Optional[str] = None,
backend: Optional[str] = None,
cache_directory: Optional[str] = None,
) -> int:
) -> Tuple[int, int]:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the return type annotation to match the actual return value

The function's return type annotation specifies Tuple[int, int], but it only returns a single int (queue_id). To prevent confusion, update the return type annotation to int to match the actual return value.

Apply this diff to fix the return type annotation:

 ) -> Tuple[int, int]:
+    ) -> int:
     """
     Execute a command by submitting it to the queuing system
     ...
     return queue_id

Also applies to: 73-73

Comment on lines +46 to +48
if resource_dict is None:
resource_dict = {}
if "cwd" in resource_dict and resource_dict["cwd"] is not None:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid mutating input parameters to prevent side effects

Modifying the resource_dict in place can lead to unexpected behavior if it's passed from outside the function. To prevent unintended side effects, make a shallow copy of resource_dict before making changes.

Apply this diff to avoid mutating the original dictionary:

 if resource_dict is None:
     resource_dict = {}
+else:
+    resource_dict = resource_dict.copy()
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if resource_dict is None:
resource_dict = {}
if "cwd" in resource_dict and resource_dict["cwd"] is not None:
if resource_dict is None:
resource_dict = {}
else:
resource_dict = resource_dict.copy()
if "cwd" in resource_dict and resource_dict["cwd"] is not None:

Comment on lines +38 to +39
check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)
queue_id = get_queue_id(file_name=file_name)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure file_name is not None before proceeding

The file_name parameter is optional, but check_file_exists and get_queue_id require a valid file name. If file_name is None, these functions may raise exceptions. Add a check to validate file_name before using it.

Apply this diff to add the validation:

+    if file_name is None:
+        raise ValueError("file_name must be provided")
     check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)
     queue_id = get_queue_id(file_name=file_name)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)
queue_id = get_queue_id(file_name=file_name)
if file_name is None:
raise ValueError("file_name must be provided")
check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)
queue_id = get_queue_id(file_name=file_name)

Comment on lines +48 to +55
if "cwd" in resource_dict and resource_dict["cwd"] is not None:
cwd = resource_dict["cwd"]
else:
cwd = cache_directory
submit_kwargs = {
"command": " ".join(command),
"dependency_list": [str(qid) for qid in task_dependent_lst],
"working_directory": os.path.abspath(cwd),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Handle potential None value for cwd to prevent errors

If both resource_dict["cwd"] and cache_directory are None, cwd will be None, which will cause os.path.abspath(cwd) to raise a TypeError. Ensure cwd is assigned a valid path before calling os.path.abspath.

Consider setting a default value or raising an exception if cwd cannot be determined:

     else:
         cwd = cache_directory
+    if cwd is None:
+        raise ValueError("Working directory (cwd) must be specified.")
     submit_kwargs = {
         "command": " ".join(command),
         "dependency_list": [str(qid) for qid in task_dependent_lst],
         "working_directory": os.path.abspath(cwd),
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if "cwd" in resource_dict and resource_dict["cwd"] is not None:
cwd = resource_dict["cwd"]
else:
cwd = cache_directory
submit_kwargs = {
"command": " ".join(command),
"dependency_list": [str(qid) for qid in task_dependent_lst],
"working_directory": os.path.abspath(cwd),
if "cwd" in resource_dict and resource_dict["cwd"] is not None:
cwd = resource_dict["cwd"]
else:
cwd = cache_directory
if cwd is None:
raise ValueError("Working directory (cwd) must be specified.")
submit_kwargs = {
"command": " ".join(command),
"dependency_list": [str(qid) for qid in task_dependent_lst],
"working_directory": os.path.abspath(cwd),

resource_dict: dict,
task_dependent_lst: List[int] = [],
command: list,
task_dependent_lst: list[int] = [],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid mutable default arguments for function parameters

Using mutable default arguments like lists can lead to unexpected behavior because the default value is shared across all function calls. In this case, task_dependent_lst: list[int] = [] should be replaced with task_dependent_lst: Optional[List[int]] = None, and initialized within the function.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

 def execute_with_pysqa(
     command: list,
-    task_dependent_lst: list[int] = [],
+    task_dependent_lst: Optional[List[int]] = None,
     file_name: Optional[str] = None,
     resource_dict: Optional[dict] = None,
     config_directory: Optional[str] = None,
     backend: Optional[str] = None,
     cache_directory: Optional[str] = None,
 ) -> Tuple[int, int]:
+    if task_dependent_lst is None:
+        task_dependent_lst = []
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
task_dependent_lst: list[int] = [],
def execute_with_pysqa(
command: list,
task_dependent_lst: Optional[List[int]] = None,
file_name: Optional[str] = None,
resource_dict: Optional[dict] = None,
config_directory: Optional[str] = None,
backend: Optional[str] = None,
cache_directory: Optional[str] = None,
) -> Tuple[int, int]:
if task_dependent_lst is None:
task_dependent_lst = []
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

13-13: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
executorlib/cache/shared.py (1)

Line range hint 130-134: Consider enhancing the job deduplication mechanism.

While using the file system to check for duplicate jobs works, consider these improvements for robustness:

  1. Use a dedicated job registry (e.g., SQLite) instead of relying solely on file existence
  2. Implement unique job IDs for better tracking
  3. Add explicit error handling for file system issues
  4. Consider adding a cleanup mechanism for orphaned files

This would make the system more resilient to concurrent access and easier to maintain.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a70682e and 8267310.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • executorlib/cache/shared.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
executorlib/cache/shared.py (1)

130-130: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update documentation and add path validation for the new file_name parameter.

The addition of the file_name parameter needs to be properly documented and validated:

  1. The docstring of execute_tasks_h5 should be updated to document the new parameter being passed to execute_function
  2. Consider adding path validation to prevent potential path traversal issues

Let's verify all callers of this function to ensure they're updated:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/test_cache_hdf.py (3)

63-74: Consider grouping related assertions

While the test is functionally correct, consider grouping the queue_id assertion with other data_dict validations for better readability and logical flow.

         self.assertTrue("fn" in data_dict.keys())
         self.assertEqual(data_dict["args"], ())
         self.assertEqual(data_dict["kwargs"], {"a": a, "b": b})
+        self.assertEqual(data_dict["queue_id"], 123)
         self.assertEqual(get_queue_id(file_name=file_name), 123)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

71-71: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


79-88: Consider adding edge cases to queue_id tests

The test verifies the basic functionality, but consider adding test cases for:

  • Missing queue_id
  • None/null queue_id
  • Invalid queue_id types

Example addition:

def test_hdf_queue_id_edge_cases(self):
    cache_directory = os.path.abspath("cache")
    os.makedirs(cache_directory, exist_ok=True)
    file_name = os.path.join(cache_directory, "test_queue_edge.h5")
    
    # Test missing queue_id
    dump(file_name=file_name, data_dict={})
    self.assertIsNone(get_queue_id(file_name=file_name))
    
    # Test None queue_id
    dump(file_name=file_name, data_dict={"queue_id": None})
    self.assertIsNone(get_queue_id(file_name=file_name))

71-71: Optimize dict key lookup

Replace .keys() with direct dictionary membership testing for better performance.

-        self.assertTrue("fn" in data_dict.keys())
+        self.assertTrue("fn" in data_dict)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

71-71: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

tests/test_shared_input_check.py (1)

101-105: Consider adding more test cases for comprehensive coverage.

While the current test cases cover basic error scenarios, consider adding tests for:

  • Empty string input
  • Directory path input
  • File with no read permissions
  • Symbolic links

Here's a suggested implementation:

     def test_check_file_exists(self):
         with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
             check_file_exists(file_name=None)
         with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
             check_file_exists(file_name="/path/does/not/exist")
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            check_file_exists(file_name="")
+        # Create a temporary directory for testing
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp_dir:
+            with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+                check_file_exists(file_name=tmp_dir)
+            # Create a file with no read permissions
+            tmp_file = os.path.join(tmp_dir, "test.txt")
+            with open(tmp_file, "w") as f:
+                f.write("test")
+            os.chmod(tmp_file, 0o000)
+            with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+                check_file_exists(file_name=tmp_file)
+            # Create and test a symbolic link
+            sym_link = os.path.join(tmp_dir, "test_link.txt")
+            os.symlink(tmp_file, sym_link)
+            with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+                check_file_exists(file_name=sym_link)

Don't forget to add the required imports:

import os
import tempfile
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8267310 and cee811e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/test_cache_hdf.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_shared_input_check.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
tests/test_cache_hdf.py

71-71: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/test_cache_hdf.py (1)

7-7: LGTM: Import changes are well-structured

The addition of get_queue_id import is properly placed within the existing try-except block that handles h5py dependency.

tests/test_shared_input_check.py (1)

20-20: LGTM!

The import statement follows the existing pattern and maintains alphabetical order.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (2)

49-54: Add docstring to clarify test cases

While the test cases correctly verify error conditions, it would be helpful to add a docstring explaining why these parameter values are invalid and what the expected behavior should be.

Consider adding documentation like this:

 def test_create_file_executor_error(self):
+    """
+    Test that create_file_executor raises ValueError when:
+    1. block_allocation is set to True (should be either False or a callable)
+    2. init_function is set to True (should be either None or a callable)
+    """
     with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
         create_file_executor(block_allocation=True)

185-189: Consider adding more error test cases

While the current error tests are good, consider adding more test cases to cover other potential error scenarios:

  • Invalid file_name
  • Non-existent file
  • Empty command list

Example addition:

def test_execute_in_subprocess_errors(self):
    # Existing tests
    with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
        execute_in_subprocess(
            file_name=__file__, command=[], config_directory="test"
        )
    with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
        execute_in_subprocess(file_name=__file__, command=[], backend="flux")
    
    # Additional test cases
    with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
        execute_in_subprocess(file_name=None, command=["echo", "test"])
    with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
        execute_in_subprocess(file_name="nonexistent.py", command=["echo", "test"])
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cee811e and 8a06907.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py

10-10: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py (3)

5-5: LGTM!

The import statement is correctly placed and the imported function is used in the implementation.


11-11: LGTM!

The file_name parameter is well-documented and properly typed as Optional[str].

Also applies to: 23-23


Line range hint 9-16: Verify function usage patterns

Let's verify how this function is used across the codebase to ensure the new optional file_name parameter doesn't break existing calls.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the implementation to understand how the file_name parameter is used within the function.


Based on the implementation and test files, I can now generate the final response:

The file_name parameter is safely optional and existing usage is compatible

  • The parameter is properly defined as Optional[str] = None
  • All existing usages in tests and implementation handle the optional parameter correctly
  • The only direct calls to execute_in_subprocess with file_name are in error test cases, while all other usages through FileExecutor handle the parameter internally
  • The function is used primarily through the FileExecutor class which manages the parameter appropriately
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage patterns of execute_in_subprocess
# Expected: Find all calls to verify if they handle the new file_name parameter correctly

# Search for function calls
echo "Searching for execute_in_subprocess calls:"
rg "execute_in_subprocess\(" -A 3

# Search for imports to ensure we catch all usage locations
echo -e "\nSearching for imports:"
rg "from.*subprocess_spawner.*import.*execute_in_subprocess"

Length of output: 1235


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of execute_in_subprocess to understand file_name usage
echo "Checking execute_in_subprocess implementation:"
rg -A 20 "def execute_in_subprocess" executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py

# Check test files for more context
echo -e "\nChecking test implementation:"
cat tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py

Length of output: 7418

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

10-10: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)

tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (1)

7-14: LGTM: Import reorganization looks good

The imports have been logically reorganized, moving subprocess-related functions to a dedicated module and adding the new create_file_executor import.

@@ -29,6 +33,7 @@ def execute_in_subprocess(
subprocess.Popen: The subprocess object.

"""
check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add None check before file existence validation

Since file_name is optional, we should add a None check before validation.

Apply this fix:

-    check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)
+    if file_name is not None:
+        check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)
if file_name is not None:
check_file_exists(file_name=file_name)

@@ -2,10 +2,13 @@
import time
from typing import Optional

from executorlib.standalone.inputcheck import check_file_exists


def execute_in_subprocess(
command: list,
task_dependent_lst: list = [],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Replace mutable default argument with None

Using mutable default arguments in Python can lead to unexpected behavior because the same list object is shared across function calls.

Apply this fix:

-    task_dependent_lst: list = [],
+    task_dependent_lst: list = None,

And update the function body:

+    if task_dependent_lst is None:
+        task_dependent_lst = []

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

10-10: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults

Replace with None; initialize within function

(B006)

@@ -163,7 +169,7 @@ def test_executor_function_dependence_args(self):
"future_queue": q,
"cache_directory": cache_dir,
"execute_function": execute_in_subprocess,
"resource_dict": {"cores": 1, "cwd": None},
"resource_dict": {"cores": 1},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Removal of 'cwd' from resource_dict is incorrect and breaks functionality

The removal of 'cwd' from resource_dict is problematic because:

  • The implementation in queue_spawner.py and subprocess_spawner.py explicitly uses the 'cwd' parameter from resource_dict
  • Other test files like test_cache_executor_pysqa_flux.py still rely on this parameter
  • The test_executor_working_directory test in the same file depends on setting 'cwd' in resource_dict
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the removal of 'cwd' from resource_dict

The 'cwd' key has been removed from the resource dictionary. While this might be intentional, we should verify that this doesn't affect the test's functionality or expected behavior.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other test files that might be affected by this change
rg -l "resource_dict.*cwd" tests/
# Check if cwd is used in the actual implementation
rg -l "resource_dict.*cwd" executorlib/

Length of output: 228


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of resource_dict and cwd usage in the implementation files
rg "resource_dict.*cwd" executorlib/cache/subprocess_spawner.py executorlib/cache/queue_spawner.py -B 2 -A 2

# Check the context in test files to understand the changes
rg "resource_dict.*cwd" tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py tests/test_cache_executor_pysqa_flux.py -B 2 -A 2

# Look for any recent changes related to this in git history
git log -p -- tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py | grep -A 5 -B 5 "resource_dict"

Length of output: 6809

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit c1b8b22 into main Nov 15, 2024
49 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the queue-resubmit branch November 15, 2024 19:19
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant