Move cache functionality to shared #434
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to import statements across several files in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_cache_executor_mpi.py (1)
9-9: Note: Unused imports are intentional.While static analysis flags
execute_tasks_h5andexecute_in_subprocessas unused, these imports are intentionally part of the availability check in the try-except block, similar to how the code checks for mpi4py availability. This is a common pattern in test files to handle optional dependencies.To silence the linter warnings, you could add these to the import line:
-from executorlib.shared.cache import execute_tasks_h5, execute_in_subprocess +from executorlib.shared.cache import execute_tasks_h5, execute_in_subprocess # noqa: F401🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
9-9:
executorlib.shared.cache.execute_tasks_h5imported but unused; consider usingimportlib.util.find_specto test for availability(F401)
9-9:
executorlib.shared.cache.execute_in_subprocessimported but unused; consider usingimportlib.util.find_specto test for availability(F401)
tests/test_cache_hdf.py (1)
7-7: Architecture change aligns with PR objectives.The relocation of HDF functionality to the shared module is consistent with the PR's goal of centralizing cache functionality. This change promotes better code organization and reusability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- executorlib/backend/cache_parallel.py (1 hunks)
- executorlib/backend/cache_serial.py (1 hunks)
- executorlib/cache/executor.py (1 hunks)
- executorlib/shared/cache.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_cache_executor_mpi.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_cache_hdf.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_cache_shared.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- executorlib/backend/cache_serial.py
- executorlib/cache/executor.py
- executorlib/shared/cache.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
tests/test_cache_executor_mpi.py
9-9:
executorlib.shared.cache.execute_tasks_h5imported but unused; consider usingimportlib.util.find_specto test for availability(F401)
9-9:
executorlib.shared.cache.execute_in_subprocessimported but unused; consider usingimportlib.util.find_specto test for availability(F401)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/test_cache_executor_mpi.py (1)
9-9: LGTM! Import path update aligns with module restructuring.The change from
executorlib.cache.sharedtoexecutorlib.shared.cacheis consistent with the PR objective of moving cache functionality to shared.Let's verify the consistency of this import path change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path migration is complete and consistent
The verification confirms that:
- No instances of the old import path
executorlib.cache.sharedremain in the codebase- The new import path
executorlib.shared.cacheis consistently used across all relevant files:
- Test files:
test_cache_shared.py,test_cache_executor_serial.py,test_cache_executor_mpi.py- Core modules:
executorlib/cache/executor.py,executorlib/backend/cache_serial.py,executorlib/backend/cache_parallel.py🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all imports of these functions use the new path # Test 1: Check for any remaining old import paths rg "from executorlib.cache.shared import" # Test 2: Verify new import path usage rg "from executorlib.shared.cache import"Length of output: 791
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
9-9:
executorlib.shared.cache.execute_tasks_h5imported but unused; consider usingimportlib.util.find_specto test for availability(F401)
9-9:
executorlib.shared.cache.execute_in_subprocessimported but unused; consider usingimportlib.util.find_specto test for availability(F401)
executorlib/backend/cache_parallel.py (2)
6-6: LGTM! Import path updated correctly.The import statement has been properly updated to use the new shared cache location, which aligns with the PR objective of centralizing shared functionalities.
6-6: Verify consistent usage of new import path.Let's ensure this import path change is consistent across all files using these cache functions.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have clear evidence that:
- No files are using the old import path
from executorlib.cache.shared import- Multiple files are consistently using the new import path
from executorlib.shared.cache import- No direct usage of the old module path
executorlib.cache.sharedwas foundImport path change is consistently implemented across the codebase
The new import path
from executorlib.shared.cache importis being used consistently in all relevant files, and no instances of the old import path remain. The change is properly synchronized across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify new import usage echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths..." rg "from executorlib.cache.shared import" -l echo "Verifying new import path usage..." rg "from executorlib.shared.cache import" -l echo "Checking for any direct usage of old module path..." rg "executorlib.cache.shared" -lLength of output: 621
tests/test_cache_hdf.py (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import statement has been properly updated to reflect the new module structure, maintaining the existing error handling pattern.
7-7: Verify function compatibility after module move.Let's ensure the moved functions maintain the same interface and behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Functions maintain compatibility after module move
The verification shows that:
- The functions were cleanly moved from
executorlib/cache/hdf.pytoexecutorlib/shared/hdf.pywithout implementation changes (100% similarity in git move)- All imports have been updated to use the new location (
executorlib.shared.hdf)- The function signatures and implementations remain identical
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the implementation of dump and load functions between old and new locations # Test 1: Check if the functions exist in both old and new locations echo "Checking function implementations in old and new locations..." rg -A 10 "def (dump|load)" # Test 2: Verify no references to the old import path remain echo "Checking for any remaining references to the old import path..." rg "from executorlib.cache.hdf import"Length of output: 1633
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the old location and any potential changes in implementation # First, check if there are any files in the old location echo "Checking for files in old location..." fd "hdf.py" executorlib/cache/ # Check git history for the move echo "Checking git history for the file move..." git log --follow --patch -- "**/hdf.py" | grep -A 10 "diff --git" # Check for any other imports of these functions echo "Checking all imports of dump and load..." rg "from.*import.*(dump|load)"Length of output: 1381
tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (2)
11-11: LGTM! Import path update aligns with module restructuring.The change from
executorlib.cache.sharedtoexecutorlib.shared.cachecorrectly reflects the movement of cache functionality to the shared module.
11-11: Verify consistent import path updates across the codebase.Let's ensure this restructuring is consistently applied across all files.
✅ Verification successful
Import path restructuring has been consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that all imports are using the new path
executorlib.shared.cacheconsistently across the codebase. No instances of the old import pathexecutorlib.cache.sharedwere found, and there are no direct references to the old module structure.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify new import paths # are used consistently echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths..." rg "from executorlib.cache.shared import" echo -e "\nVerifying new import paths..." rg "from executorlib.shared.cache import" echo -e "\nChecking for any direct references to the old module..." rg "executorlib.cache.shared"Length of output: 1126
| from executorlib.shared.hdf import dump | ||
| from executorlib.shared.cache import ( | ||
| FutureItem, | ||
| _check_task_output, | ||
| _serialize_funct_h5, | ||
| ) | ||
| from executorlib.cache.shared import execute_task_in_file | ||
| from executorlib.shared.cache import execute_task_in_file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Import changes are correct but there's one remaining old import path to update
The import changes in tests/test_cache_shared.py are correct and all the imported symbols exist in their new locations under executorlib/shared/. However, there's still one file that needs to be updated:
executorlib/__init__.pystill uses the old import path:from executorlib.cache.executor import FileExecutor
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Import changes align with module restructuring.
The import path updates correctly reflect the movement of cache functionality to the shared module.
Let's verify the new module structure:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the module structure and import consistency
# Test 1: Verify the new shared module structure exists
echo "Verifying shared module structure..."
fd -t d "shared$" executorlib
# Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old cache paths
echo "Checking for old cache import references..."
rg "from executorlib.cache.(shared|hdf)" -g '!*.pyc'
Length of output: 286
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the module structure and imports more thoroughly
# Check if the imported modules exist in the new location
echo "Checking for cache.py in shared..."
fd "cache.py$" executorlib/shared
echo "Checking for hdf.py in shared..."
fd "hdf.py$" executorlib/shared
# Verify the specific imports exist in their new locations
echo "Verifying specific imports in shared/cache.py..."
rg "class FutureItem|def _check_task_output|def _serialize_funct_h5|def execute_task_in_file" executorlib/shared/cache.py
echo "Verifying dump in shared/hdf.py..."
rg "def dump" executorlib/shared/hdf.py
# Check for any other files still using old import paths
echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths..."
rg "from executorlib\.cache\." --type py
Length of output: 1084
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
backend_load_file,backend_write_file,execute_task_in_file, and others to enhance code structure and maintainability.Tests