Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lfp parameters #1209

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Oct 25, 2020
Merged

Lfp parameters #1209

merged 27 commits into from
Oct 25, 2020

Conversation

valentinsulzer
Copy link
Member

Description

Add parameters for A123 LFP cells

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (back-end change that speeds up the code)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ flake8
  • All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --unit
  • The documentation builds: $ cd docs and then $ make clean; make html

You can run all three at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick.

Further checks:

  • Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

dalbamont and others added 23 commits April 7, 2020 23:05
…in 2019 papers

Added parameters for A123 cell - based on Lain 2019 paper
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upsteam/master' into develop
…the "Parameter Evolution" file

To be cleaned and updated later
@valentinsulzer
Copy link
Member Author

@all-contributors add @dalbamont for code

@allcontributors
Copy link
Contributor

@tinosulzer

I've put up a pull request to add @dalbamont! 🎉

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1209 into develop will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 98.14%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1209   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.93%   97.93%           
========================================
  Files          247      249    +2     
  Lines        14048    14062   +14     
========================================
+ Hits         13758    13772   +14     
  Misses         290      290           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
..._battery_models/lithium_ion/basic_dfn_half_cell.py 99.21% <ø> (ø)
...odels/full_battery_models/lithium_ion/basic_spm.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
pybamm/expression_tree/operations/evaluate.py 97.14% <95.45%> (ø)
pybamm/solvers/jax_bdf_solver.py 99.04% <98.27%> (ø)
...ctrolyte_exchange_current_density_kashkooli2017.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...m-ion/cathodes/LFP_Prada2013/LFP_ocp_ashfar2017.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/meshes/one_dimensional_submeshes.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/parameters/parameter_sets.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/solvers/jax_solver.py 98.14% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 1 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2f594b2...90250c4. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@brosaplanella brosaplanella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work, just a few changes before we can merge. Also, take a look at the codacy report as there are two issues (basically a blank space and a blank line).

@valentinsulzer
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @brosaplanella for all those good catches!

Copy link
Member

@brosaplanella brosaplanella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks @tinosulzer and @dalbamont!

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer merged commit a975b9f into develop Oct 25, 2020
@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer deleted the lfp-parameters branch October 25, 2020 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants