-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v8.2.0 seeing failed assertions leading to panics in terraform bridge #2405
v8.2.0 seeing failed assertions leading to panics in terraform bridge #2405
Comments
Hi @scttl, thank you for filing this issue. I could reproduce this issue with the following steps:
Additionally I've verified this does not panic on v8.1.0. We're hoping to have a fix for this soon. Thank you again for reporting. |
Seeing the same error elsewhere: pulumi/pulumi-hcloud#603 |
Following up on pulumi/pulumi-gcp#2405, this PR adds a comment to Configure explaining that ConfigureRequest.args may contain secrets.
Hi @scttl - we have reverted the bridge change that caused this behavior. This week's new GCP release will incorporate that version. I've verified with a local build that the changes address your issue. Once pulumi-gcp v8.3.0 is merged and released you should be able to upgrade to that version. Please let us know if you continue to see trouble - thank you very much for your patience here. 🙏 |
8.3.0 is released. Please upgrade to 8.3.0. We apologize for the trouble. |
Thanks @guineveresaenger ! v8.3.0 works well for me too. |
Describe what happened
After upgrading from v8.1.0 to v8.2.0 we started encountering errors running
pulumi preview
orpulumi deploy
of any gcp related resources:The identical code snippet (below) previews and deploys fine on v8.1.0
Sample program
index.ts;
gcp related vars like
project
andcredentials
are defined in a configPulumi.stack.yaml
Log output
No response
Affected Resource(s)
No response
Output of
pulumi about
❯ pulumi about (irrelevant values redacted via
###
)Additional context
No response
Contributing
Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction.
To contribute a fix for this issue, leave a comment (and link to your pull request, if you've opened one already).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: