Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use std::get where it's available #815

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2015

Conversation

TeBoring
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@TeBoring
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xfxyjwf to review

@TeBoring TeBoring force-pushed the third-party branch 6 times, most recently from 1cac7b6 to 7d115ad Compare September 22, 2015 17:41
@xfxyjwf
Copy link
Contributor

xfxyjwf commented Oct 9, 2015

LGTM

TeBoring added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2015
Use std::get where it's available
@TeBoring TeBoring merged commit 49f24af into protocolbuffers:master Oct 9, 2015
@mxmark
Copy link

mxmark commented Aug 16, 2016

Hi, This change moves functions like "Closure * NewCallback(..)" into the internal namespace. Is it okay to use such functions inside this "internal" namespace ? If not, is there a new recommended way to create Closures that we we can pass to the stubs generated by the protobuf compiler ?

@xfxyjwf
Copy link
Contributor

xfxyjwf commented Aug 16, 2016

@mxmark hmm, I didn't notice that Closure/Callback is used in the generated stub code. I guess we just need to move the related code back to google::protobuf namespace... Can you help create a github issue for that?

@mxmark
Copy link

mxmark commented Aug 16, 2016

Thanks @xfxyjwf for the quick reply! I created #1966 for this.

bithium pushed a commit to bithium/protobuf that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants