[PICS] Update PICS.yaml with the latest PICS from the test plan, upda…

[vivien-apple]

…te ci-pics-values accordingly and add many missing keys, remove some unknown keys, fix some mistype keys and apply the relevant changes to the related testcases

Problem

I initially found that PICS_MCORE_UI_FACTORYRESET and MCORE.FACTORY_RESET coexists in our YAML tests.
I then tried to update the PICS.yaml file that is the reference for our default CI PICS configuration at src/app/tests/suites/certification/ci-pics-values

It appears that they were a lot of differences between the latest PICS database and ours. I have updated PICS.yaml and ci-pics-values to reflect that. I have also updated out tests suites to reflect that.

The test plan database was missing some keys as well. I have opened https://github.com/CHIP-Specifications/chip-test-plans/pull/2427 for that...

[github-actions]

PR #24923: Size comparison from c49ee00 to 09bb896

Increases (1 build for cc32xx)

platform	target	config	section	c49ee00	09bb896	change	% change
cc32xx	lock	CC3235SF_LAUNCHXL	.debug_info	20141926	20141927	1	0.0

Full report (1 build for cc32xx)

platform	target	config	section	c49ee00	09bb896	change	% change
cc32xx	lock	CC3235SF_LAUNCHXL		0	0	0	0.0
			(read only)	640249	640249	0	0.0
			(read/write)	204084	204084	0	0.0
			.ARM.attributes	44	44	0	0.0
			.ARM.exidx	8	8	0	0.0
			.bss	197488	197488	0	0.0
			.comment	194	194	0	0.0
			.data	1476	1476	0	0.0
			.debug_abbrev	928439	928439	0	0.0
			.debug_aranges	87352	87352	0	0.0
			.debug_frame	299840	299840	0	0.0
			.debug_info	20141926	20141927	1	0.0
			.debug_line	2649806	2649806	0	0.0
			.debug_loc	2785917	2785917	0	0.0
			.debug_ranges	280720	280720	0	0.0
			.debug_str	2979174	2979174	0	0.0
			.ramVecs	780	780	0	0.0
			.resetVecs	64	64	0	0.0
			.rodata	105601	105601	0	0.0
			.shstrtab	232	232	0	0.0
			.stab	204	204	0	0.0
			.stabstr	441	441	0	0.0
			.stack	2048	2048	0	0.0
			.strtab	375840	375840	0	0.0
			.symtab	255856	255856	0	0.0
			.text	532524	532524	0	0.0

[bzbarsky-apple]

Assuming this ends up running/skipping the same set of tests as before, looks good.

[github-actions]

PR #24923: Size comparison from c49ee00 to 18db7cc

Increases (2 builds for cc32xx, nrfconnect)

platform	target	config	section	c49ee00	18db7cc	change	% change
cc32xx	lock	CC3235SF_LAUNCHXL	.debug_info	20141926	20141928	2	0.0
nrfconnect	all-clusters-app	nrf52840dk_nrf52840	(read/write)	1162340	1162356	16	0.0
			text	804540	804544	4	0.0

Full report (10 builds for cc32xx, k32w, mbed, nrfconnect, qpg)

platform	target	config	section	c49ee00	18db7cc	change	% change
cc32xx	lock	CC3235SF_LAUNCHXL		0	0	0	0.0
			(read only)	640249	640249	0	0.0
			(read/write)	204084	204084	0	0.0
			.ARM.attributes	44	44	0	0.0
			.ARM.exidx	8	8	0	0.0
			.bss	197488	197488	0	0.0
			.comment	194	194	0	0.0
			.data	1476	1476	0	0.0
			.debug_abbrev	928439	928439	0	0.0
			.debug_aranges	87352	87352	0	0.0
			.debug_frame	299840	299840	0	0.0
			.debug_info	20141926	20141928	2	0.0
			.debug_line	2649806	2649806	0	0.0
			.debug_loc	2785917	2785917	0	0.0
			.debug_ranges	280720	280720	0	0.0
			.debug_str	2979174	2979174	0	0.0
			.ramVecs	780	780	0	0.0
			.resetVecs	64	64	0	0.0
			.rodata	105601	105601	0	0.0
			.shstrtab	232	232	0	0.0
			.stab	204	204	0	0.0
			.stabstr	441	441	0	0.0
			.stack	2048	2048	0	0.0
			.strtab	375840	375840	0	0.0
			.symtab	255856	255856	0	0.0
			.text	532524	532524	0	0.0
k32w	contact	k32w0+release	(read/write)	660108	660108	0	0.0
			.bss	76560	76560	0	0.0
			.data	2112	2112	0	0.0
			.text	562324	562324	0	0.0
	light	k32w0+release	(read/write)	672368	672368	0	0.0
			.bss	74344	74344	0	0.0
			.data	2064	2064	0	0.0
			.text	593232	593232	0	0.0
	lock	k32w0+release	(read/write)	631760	631760	0	0.0
			.bss	75112	75112	0	0.0
			.data	2084	2084	0	0.0
			.text	551836	551836	0	0.0
mbed	lock-app	CY8CPROTO_062_4343W+release	(read only)	6224	6224	0	0.0
			(read/write)	2464592	2464592	0	0.0
			.bss	215892	215892	0	0.0
			.data	5880	5880	0	0.0
			.text	1427236	1427236	0	0.0
nrfconnect	all-clusters-app	nrf52840dk_nrf52840	(read only)	4	4	0	0.0
			(read/write)	1162340	1162356	16	0.0
			bss	143531	143531	0	0.0
			rodata	134384	134384	0	0.0
			text	804540	804544	4	0.0
	all-clusters-minimal-app	nrf52840dk_nrf52840	(read only)	4	4	0	0.0
			(read/write)	1108360	1108360	0	0.0
			bss	142687	142687	0	0.0
			rodata	111364	111364	0	0.0
			text	774540	774540	0	0.0
	all-clusters-app	nrf7002dk_nrf5340_cpuapp	(read only)	4	4	0	0.0
			(read/write)	1367608	1367608	0	0.0
			bss	105990	105990	0	0.0
			rodata	211816	211816	0	0.0
			text	764276	764276	0	0.0
qpg	lighting-app	qpg6105+debug	(read/write)	1148688	1148688	0	0.0
			.bss	99876	99876	0	0.0
			.data	848	848	0	0.0
			.text	595788	595788	0	0.0
	lock-app	qpg6105+debug	(read/write)	1116752	1116752	0	0.0
			.bss	96396	96396	0	0.0
			.data	860	860	0	0.0
			.text	563848	563848	0	0.0

[vivien-apple]

I looked at how many steps are skipped before and after this change. In both cases the CI is skipping 666 steps at the moment.