Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restyle [mrp] Align MRP backoff time calculation with spec #21396

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

restyled-io[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@restyled-io restyled-io bot commented Jul 29, 2022

A duplicate of #21356 with additional commits that automatically address
incorrect style, created by Restyled.

⚠️ Even though this PR is not a Fork, it contains outside contributions.
Please review accordingly.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.

The following Restylers made fixes:

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

  1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

  2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
    the original Pull Request

    Expand for example instructions
    ```console
    git remote add upstream https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip.git
    git fetch upstream pull/<this PR number>/head
    git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
    git push
    ```
    

NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.

Damian-Nordic and others added 5 commits July 29, 2022 09:10
Make variables and comments in the function more aligned
with the current spec version so that it is easier to
compare the code with the spec.

Signed-off-by: Damian Krolik <[email protected]>
Base interval (active or idle) should be multiplied by
MRP_BACKOFF_MARGIN = 1.1 before putting it in the MRP
backoff formula.

Signed-off-by: Damian Krolik <[email protected]>
When sender is sleepy, it may take more time until it
receives an acknowledgment from a peer, so MRP backoff time
should be extended by the sleepy active interval.

Signed-off-by: Damian Krolik <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants