fix undefined behaviour when loading control file #1466
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: usamoi <[email protected]>
|
It seems to predate that. |
|
Very "I have no idea how anything actually has been working" hours here, but lgtm. |
|
Oh, no, you're right, this was introduced there. |
workingjubilee
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2024
#911 introduced using the wrong signature and this UB was missed in review amidst the thousands of lines of changes. Signed-off-by: usamoi <[email protected]>
Merged
workingjubilee
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2024
The pgrx 0.11.3 release addresses a few UB risks in pgrx, updates its dependencies on many points, and includes many additional headers. It should also now be easier to use cargo-pgrx on more-complicated network configurations. ## New Bindings! New bindings added thanks to - @burmecia in #1432 - @daamien in - #1431 - #1485 - @rebasedming in #1486 - @usamoi in #1436 - @workingjubilee in #1453 ## "...wait, that's UB?" Two UB fixes! - Thanks to @Lokathor in #1443 - Thanks to @usamoi in #1466 ## Ergonomics - A better `ereport!` macro in #1472 ## Less transport-level security problems in cargo-pgrx - We no longer secretly require rustls! Thanks to @jirutka in #1448 - We now use native certs if possible, even with rustls, since #1449 Together these should mean it's possible to actually use cargo-pgrx on whatever your network configuration is, but you might have to use `cargo install --no-default-features --features native-tls` to install with native-tls (which, on Linux, means OpenSSL). By default, you will use rustls. ## Many dependency updates These address some largely-hypothetical security risks, but one is particularly important: the bindgen update means we now should be compatible with some aarch64 builds that might have failed. - #1492 - #1493 - #1494
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It is introduced in #911 and it should be a mistake.