forked from galaxyproject/iwc
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
My edits to rnaseq sr #2
Closed
lldelisle
wants to merge
120
commits into
pavanvidem:rnaseq-sr-0.10
from
lldelisle:ld_edits_rnaseq_sr
Closed
My edits to rnaseq sr #2
lldelisle
wants to merge
120
commits into
pavanvidem:rnaseq-sr-0.10
from
lldelisle:ld_edits_rnaseq_sr
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…om 0.1.1 to 0.1.2
…ors option introduced
…from 1.1.4 to 1.1.5
…n single-end workflow
…roject.org TODO: work out support for either baseUrl, set on the fly? Maybe yagni.
Unset nuxt base path prefix to support iwc.galaxyproject.org
I assume it was meant like this
…ch-1 Clarify masthead links
first release of RNAseq DE analysis, filtering and plotting workflow
[BHEU2024] Update workflows/imaging/fluorescence-nuclei-segmentation-and-counting from 0.1 to 0.2
- use fastp instead of cutadapt which allows optional adapters - generate a combined report if additional QC are not wanted - include the gene counts from STAR in the multiQC - hide more intermediate outputs - do not consider FeatureCounts Summary Table as a workflow output
My proposed changes to RNA-seq PE
…deseq Update PE RNA-seq workflow
- improve changelog - use fastp instead of cutadapt - update cufflinks - add multiQC even if no additional QC are performed. - hide intermediate steps - change some parameter names - update README to better description of parameters - add missing asserts in tests
@lldelisle there are 120 commits and 43 files changed. It should merge the updates from the main branch. Should I merge? |
You're right. #3 is probably cleaner. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I merged the main branch of IWC +
- use verion 1.0
- improve changelog
- use fastp instead of cutadapt
- update cufflinks
- add multiQC even if no additional QC are performed.
- hide intermediate steps
- change some parameter names
- update README to better description of parameters
- add missing asserts in tests