Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate production_build in favour of upstream_koji_build #527

Merged

Conversation

lachmanfrantisek
Copy link
Member

Deprecate also the build alias since it's too generic.

Related to packit/packit-service#1656 and packit/packit#1728

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 20s
✔️ hugo SUCCESS in 57s

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 25s
✔️ hugo SUCCESS in 1m 23s

softwarefactory-project-zuul bot added a commit to packit/packit-service that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2022
Deprecate production_build in favour of upstream_koji_build

Deprecate also the build alias since it's too generic.
Fixes: packit/packit#1658
Requires: packit/packit#1728
Documentation: packit/packit.dev#527

RELEASE NOTES BEGIN
There are two changes in the naming of the service jobs:
The build job type name has been deprecated. It aimed to be an alias when Packit supported just one build type.
There are currently more types of builds and just build can be misleading. Please, be explicit and use copr_build instead.
The production_build name for upstream Koji build is misleading because it is not used to run production/non-scratch builds and because it can be confused with the koji_build job that is triggered for dist-git commits.
(The koji_build job can trigger both scratch and non-scratch/production builds.)
To be explicit, use upstream_koji_build for builds triggered in upstream and koji_build for builds triggered in downstream.
Users will get a neutral status describing the change when the old names are in use. The status will become a warning starting in November and the old names will be removed by the end of the year.
RELEASE NOTES END

Reviewed-by: Tomas Tomecek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Laura Barcziová <None>
@lachmanfrantisek lachmanfrantisek added the mergeit When set, zuul wil gate and merge the PR. label Oct 14, 2022
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 11s
✔️ hugo SUCCESS in 52s

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded (gate pipeline).

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 14s

@softwarefactory-project-zuul softwarefactory-project-zuul bot merged commit e327740 into packit:main Oct 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mergeit When set, zuul wil gate and merge the PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants