Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tests-only][full-ci]add test for search version restored files by content #6970

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2023

Conversation

nabim777
Copy link
Member

@nabim777 nabim777 commented Aug 7, 2023

Description

This PR adds the API tests for search version restored files through a content. The scenarios added in this PR are

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

  • there was no test coverage for api test for search version restored files through a content. so, this PR covers the require scenario test case

How Has This Been Tested?

  • test environment:
  • locally
  • CI

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

@nabim777 nabim777 self-assigned this Aug 7, 2023
@nabim777 nabim777 force-pushed the search-version-restored-files-by-content branch from 54206d8 to 3426e44 Compare August 7, 2023 06:44
@nabim777 nabim777 mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2023
51 tasks
@nabim777 nabim777 force-pushed the search-version-restored-files-by-content branch from 3426e44 to a16e3e7 Compare August 7, 2023 06:59
Copy link
Member

@saw-jan saw-jan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nabim777 nabim777 force-pushed the search-version-restored-files-by-content branch 2 times, most recently from 5b9bf6b to ab86021 Compare August 8, 2023 05:49
Copy link
Member

@SagarGi SagarGi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@amrita-shrestha amrita-shrestha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@amrita-shrestha amrita-shrestha requested a review from SagarGi August 9, 2023 04:45
@nabim777 nabim777 force-pushed the search-version-restored-files-by-content branch from ab86021 to 6294483 Compare August 9, 2023 07:16
@nabim777 nabim777 force-pushed the search-version-restored-files-by-content branch from 6294483 to 3eb341c Compare August 9, 2023 07:20
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 9, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Contributor

@amrita-shrestha amrita-shrestha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@saw-jan saw-jan merged commit cbe945a into master Aug 9, 2023
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the search-version-restored-files-by-content branch August 9, 2023 08:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants