Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[tests-only][full-ci]add test for search version restored files by tag #6974

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2023
Merged

[tests-only][full-ci]add test for search version restored files by tag #6974

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2023

Conversation

nabim777
Copy link
Member

@nabim777 nabim777 commented Aug 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Description

This PR adds the API tests for search version restored files through a tag. The scenarios added in this PR are

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

  • there was no test coverage for api test for search version restored files through a tag. so, this PR covers the require scenario test case

How Has This Been Tested?

  • test environment:
  • locally
  • CI

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

@nabim777 nabim777 self-assigned this Aug 7, 2023
@nabim777 nabim777 mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2023
Closed
51 tasks
saw-jan
saw-jan reviewed Aug 7, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@saw-jan saw-jan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@saw-jan saw-jan requested a review from ScharfViktor August 7, 2023 12:01
SagarGi
SagarGi previously approved these changes Aug 8, 2023
View reviewed changes
tests/acceptance/features/apiGraph/fullSearch.feature Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@SagarGi SagarGi dismissed their stale review August 8, 2023 03:49

opps !! mistakenly approved.

@nabim777 nabim777 requested review from SwikritiT and SagarGi August 8, 2023 03:51
@nabim777 nabim777 force-pushed the search-version-restored-files-by-tag branch 2 times, most recently from bc42f0c to da9db37 Compare August 8, 2023 04:52
@nabim777 nabim777 force-pushed the search-version-restored-files-by-tag branch from da9db37 to a5fd763 Compare August 8, 2023 05:42
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@nabim777 nabim777 requested a review from saw-jan August 8, 2023 06:30
@saw-jan saw-jan merged commit 3eb5a22 into master Aug 8, 2023
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2023
@nabim777
add test for search version restored files by tag (#6974)
1f4c44a
@nabim777 nabim777 mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2023
Merged
@nabim777 nabim777 deleted the search-version-restored-files-by-tag branch August 12, 2024 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@SwikritiT SwikritiT SwikritiT approved these changes

@grgprarup grgprarup Awaiting requested review from grgprarup

@amrita-shrestha amrita-shrestha Awaiting requested review from amrita-shrestha

@PrajwolAmatya PrajwolAmatya Awaiting requested review from PrajwolAmatya

@ScharfViktor ScharfViktor Awaiting requested review from ScharfViktor

@SagarGi SagarGi Awaiting requested review from SagarGi

@saw-jan saw-jan Awaiting requested review from saw-jan

Assignees

@nabim777 nabim777

Labels
QA:team
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@nabim777 @SwikritiT @SagarGi @saw-jan