Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auto: code-gen upgrade handler v28 #8850

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

osmo-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Update report

  • Created a new empty upgrade handler
  • Increased E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in Makefile by 1
  • Increased OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in .vscode/launch.json by 1

@osmo-bot osmo-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2024 12:16
@osmo-bot osmo-bot added C:app-wiring Changes to the app folder C:e2e T:auto Automatic items V:state/breaking State machine breaking PR labels Nov 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to several files to accommodate the new upgrade version v28. Changes include modifying the Makefile to update the E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION, adding v28 to the list of upgrades in app.go, and introducing two new files in the app/upgrades/v28 package: constants.go and upgrades.go, which define constants and a function for handling the upgrade. Additionally, the config.go file in the tests/e2e/containers package updates version tags for pre-upgrade scenarios.

Changes

File Change Summary
Makefile Updated E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION from "v27" to "v28".
app/app.go Added v28 to the Upgrades slice.
app/upgrades/v28/constants.go Introduced constants: UpgradeName as "v28" and a variable Upgrade encapsulating the upgrade.
app/upgrades/v28/upgrades.go Added function CreateUpgradeHandler for managing the upgrade process, ensuring migrations run first.
tests/e2e/containers/config.go Updated previousVersionOsmoTag from "26.0.0-alpine" to "27.0.0-alpine" and previousVersionInitTag from "main-edaa9483-1727355809" to "27.0.0".

Possibly related PRs

  • auto: code-gen upgrade handler v27 #8724: This PR updates the E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile from "v26" to "v27", which is directly related to the version update in the main PR where E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION is changed from "v27" to "v28".
  • fix: supply offsets for osmo token #8751: This PR introduces the v27 upgrade in the app.go file, which is relevant as the main PR updates the version to v28, indicating a progression in the upgrade versions.
  • chore: update tagged submodules for v27 #8801: This PR updates the CHANGELOG.md to include entries for version 27, which is relevant as the main PR is transitioning from version 27 to version 28.

Suggested labels

T:build, V:state/compatible/no_backport

Suggested reviewers

  • czarcas7ic
  • nicolaslara
  • crnbarr93

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d652dfb and 2f1da57.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .vscode/launch.json is excluded by !**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • app/app.go (2 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/v28/constants.go (1 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/v28/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/containers/config.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • Makefile
  • app/upgrades/v28/constants.go
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/upgrades/v28/upgrades.go (3)

1-11: LGTM: Package and imports are well-structured

The package name and imports are appropriate for an upgrade handler, correctly importing necessary dependencies from both Cosmos SDK and Osmosis.


13-18: LGTM: Function signature follows Cosmos SDK patterns

The handler function signature correctly implements the expected interface with appropriate parameters.


19-28: Verify: Empty upgrade handler implementation

The upgrade handler only runs migrations without implementing any state changes. While this follows best practices for migration ordering (as noted in the comments), it's unusual for a production upgrade to have no state changes.

Please verify:

  1. Is this intentional for v28?
  2. Are there any planned state changes that should be implemented?
✅ Verification successful

Empty upgrade handler is intentional for v28

Based on the verification results, this appears to be an intentional implementation. The evidence supports this conclusion:

  1. No TODOs, planned changes, or additional upgrade-related files were found for v28
  2. No migrations specific to v28 were discovered
  3. No entries in the changelog indicating pending changes
  4. Comparing with v27 (which had specific state changes), v28 follows the same pattern but simply doesn't require additional state modifications

The empty upgrade handler that only runs migrations is a valid implementation when no state changes are needed for a particular version upgrade. This is especially common when the upgrade primarily consists of code changes rather than state migrations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any pending TODOs or planned changes for v28 upgrade

# Check for TODOs or related comments about v28 upgrade
rg -i "todo.*v28|v28.*todo" 

# Check for any additional v28 upgrade related files that might contain planned changes
fd -t f "v28" app/upgrades

# Look for discussions or documentation about v28 upgrade plans
rg -i "v28.*(upgrade|migration|change)" -g "*.md"

Length of output: 108


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the migrations that are being run in v28 upgrade
rg -A 10 "RunMigrations.*v28" 

# Check the v28 upgrade handler implementation and surrounding context
cat app/upgrades/v28/upgrades.go

# Look for any related changes or PRs that introduced v28
rg -i "v28" CHANGELOG.md

# Check if there are any migrations defined for v28
fd -t f . app/migrations | grep -i "v28"

Length of output: 1020


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for migrations in a different location
fd -t f migrations

# Check for any commit messages or PR descriptions related to v28
git log --grep="v28" --oneline

# Look for any module upgrades or state migrations in the codebase
rg -i "v28.*migration" 

# Check the previous upgrade (v27) to understand the pattern
cat app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go

Length of output: 1878

tests/e2e/containers/config.go (2)

30-30: Good improvement in version tagging.

The change from a git commit-based tag (main-edaa9483-1727355809) to semantic versioning (27.0.0) for previousVersionInitTag improves consistency and makes the version relationship clearer.


27-27: LGTM! Verify Docker image availability.

The version increments from v26 to v27 are correct for testing the v28 upgrade.

Let's verify the existence of these Docker images:

Also applies to: 30-30

✅ Verification successful

Docker images verified and available

Both required Docker images are confirmed to exist and are actively maintained:

  • osmolabs/osmosis:27.0.0-alpine - Last pulled 27 Nov 2024
  • osmolabs/osmosis-e2e-init-chain:27.0.0 - Last pulled 27 Nov 2024
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the required Docker images exist in Docker Hub
# Expected: Both images should exist and be pullable

# Check osmosis image
curl -s "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/osmolabs/osmosis/tags/27.0.0-alpine"

# Check init chain image
curl -s "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/osmolabs/osmosis-e2e-init-chain/tags/27.0.0"

Length of output: 3634

app/app.go (2)

139-139: LGTM!

The import of the v28 upgrade package follows the established pattern and is correctly placed in the upgrade imports section.


197-197: Verify upgrade handler registration

The addition of v28.Upgrade to the upgrades slice is correct and maintains the proper sequence of upgrades.

Let's verify that the v28 upgrade handler is properly registered:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:

Upgrade handler v28 is properly registered and implemented

The verification confirms that:

  • The v28 upgrade handler exists and is properly defined with the correct upgrade name
  • The CreateUpgradeHandler function is implemented with the standard upgrade handler pattern
  • The v28 upgrade is correctly registered in the upgrades slice in sequential order
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify v28 upgrade handler implementation and registration

# Check if v28 upgrade handler exists and is properly defined
ast-grep --pattern 'const UpgradeName = "v28"' 

# Check if CreateUpgradeHandler function is defined for v28
ast-grep --pattern 'func CreateUpgradeHandler(
  $$$
) upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler {
  $$$
}'

# Verify upgrade store loader registration
ast-grep --pattern 'var Upgrades = []upgrades.Upgrade{
  $$$
  v28.Upgrade,
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 98310


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@PaddyMc PaddyMc merged commit a583e51 into main Nov 27, 2024
1 check passed
@PaddyMc PaddyMc deleted the create-pull-request/upgrade-v28 branch November 27, 2024 13:24
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A:no-changelog C:app-wiring Changes to the app folder C:e2e T:auto Automatic items T:build V:state/breaking State machine breaking PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants