-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 606
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
auto: code-gen upgrade handler v28 #8850
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to several files to accommodate the new upgrade version Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
🔇 Additional comments (7)app/upgrades/v28/upgrades.go (3)
The package name and imports are appropriate for an upgrade handler, correctly importing necessary dependencies from both Cosmos SDK and Osmosis.
The handler function signature correctly implements the expected interface with appropriate parameters.
The upgrade handler only runs migrations without implementing any state changes. While this follows best practices for migration ordering (as noted in the comments), it's unusual for a production upgrade to have no state changes. Please verify:
✅ Verification successfulEmpty upgrade handler is intentional for v28 Based on the verification results, this appears to be an intentional implementation. The evidence supports this conclusion:
The empty upgrade handler that only runs migrations is a valid implementation when no state changes are needed for a particular version upgrade. This is especially common when the upgrade primarily consists of code changes rather than state migrations. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any pending TODOs or planned changes for v28 upgrade
# Check for TODOs or related comments about v28 upgrade
rg -i "todo.*v28|v28.*todo"
# Check for any additional v28 upgrade related files that might contain planned changes
fd -t f "v28" app/upgrades
# Look for discussions or documentation about v28 upgrade plans
rg -i "v28.*(upgrade|migration|change)" -g "*.md"
Length of output: 108 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the migrations that are being run in v28 upgrade
rg -A 10 "RunMigrations.*v28"
# Check the v28 upgrade handler implementation and surrounding context
cat app/upgrades/v28/upgrades.go
# Look for any related changes or PRs that introduced v28
rg -i "v28" CHANGELOG.md
# Check if there are any migrations defined for v28
fd -t f . app/migrations | grep -i "v28"
Length of output: 1020 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check for migrations in a different location
fd -t f migrations
# Check for any commit messages or PR descriptions related to v28
git log --grep="v28" --oneline
# Look for any module upgrades or state migrations in the codebase
rg -i "v28.*migration"
# Check the previous upgrade (v27) to understand the pattern
cat app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go
Length of output: 1878 tests/e2e/containers/config.go (2)
The change from a git commit-based tag (
The version increments from v26 to v27 are correct for testing the v28 upgrade. Let's verify the existence of these Docker images: Also applies to: 30-30 ✅ Verification successfulDocker images verified and available Both required Docker images are confirmed to exist and are actively maintained:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the required Docker images exist in Docker Hub
# Expected: Both images should exist and be pullable
# Check osmosis image
curl -s "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/osmolabs/osmosis/tags/27.0.0-alpine"
# Check init chain image
curl -s "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/osmolabs/osmosis-e2e-init-chain/tags/27.0.0"
Length of output: 3634 app/app.go (2)
The import of the v28 upgrade package follows the established pattern and is correctly placed in the upgrade imports section.
The addition of Let's verify that the v28 upgrade handler is properly registered: ✅ Verification successfulBased on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response: Upgrade handler v28 is properly registered and implemented The verification confirms that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify v28 upgrade handler implementation and registration
# Check if v28 upgrade handler exists and is properly defined
ast-grep --pattern 'const UpgradeName = "v28"'
# Check if CreateUpgradeHandler function is defined for v28
ast-grep --pattern 'func CreateUpgradeHandler(
$$$
) upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler {
$$$
}'
# Verify upgrade store loader registration
ast-grep --pattern 'var Upgrades = []upgrades.Upgrade{
$$$
v28.Upgrade,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 98310 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Update report