auto: code-gen upgrade handler v27 #8724
Conversation
osmo-bot
added
C:app-wiring
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThe changes involve updating the versioning for the Osmosis application from Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Application
participant UpgradeHandler
participant ModuleManager
User->>Application: Request upgrade to v27
Application->>UpgradeHandler: Create upgrade handler
UpgradeHandler->>ModuleManager: Run migrations
ModuleManager-->>UpgradeHandler: Return migration results
UpgradeHandler-->>Application: Complete upgrade process
Application-->>User: Upgrade to v27 successful
Tip You can disable the changed files summary in the walkthrough.Disable the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- .vscode/launch.json (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- app/app.go (2 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v27/constants.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
- tests/e2e/containers/config.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
app/app.go
[failure] 137-137:
could not import github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27 (-: # github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement (typecheck)
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement) (typecheck)
GitHub Check: go (00)
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement
GitHub Check: osmosisd-darwin-amd64
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement
GitHub Check: test
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement
Additional comments not posted (13)
app/upgrades/v27/constants.go (4)
1-7: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.The package name
v27is appropriate for this upgrade file. The imports are relevant and correctly reference the previous version (v26) of Osmosis, which is expected when defining an upgrade.
9-10: LGTM: UpgradeName constant is well-defined.The
UpgradeNameconstant is correctly set to "v27", which aligns with the upgrade version. The accompanying comment provides clear documentation about its purpose.
12-19: LGTM: Upgrade variable is correctly structured.The
Upgradevariable is well-defined with the appropriate fields for the upgrade process. The empty slices forAddedandDeletedstores indicate that no store changes are planned for this upgrade, which is fine if intended.
14-14: Verify the CreateUpgradeHandler function.The
CreateUpgradeHandleris referenced here but not defined in this file. Please ensure that this function is properly implemented in another file within thev27package.Run the following script to verify the existence of the CreateUpgradeHandler function:
Verification successful
CreateUpgradeHandler is properly implemented in the v27 package.
TheCreateUpgradeHandlerfunction is defined inapp/upgrades/v27/upgrades.goand correctly follows the standard implementation pattern for upgrade handlers by executing migrations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of CreateUpgradeHandler function in the v27 package. # Test: Search for the CreateUpgradeHandler function definition in the v27 package. # Expect: A function definition for CreateUpgradeHandler. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func CreateUpgradeHandler($$$) $$$'Length of output: 94827
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: View the contents of the CreateUpgradeHandler function in the v27 package. cat app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.goLength of output: 846
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go (3)
3-10: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and necessary.The imported packages are correctly chosen for implementing the upgrade handler. They include essential types and modules from Cosmos SDK and Osmosis.
18-27: LGTM: Implementation follows best practices, but verify if additional upgrade logic is needed.The implementation correctly runs migrations before applying any other state changes, which is a good practice. However, it's worth noting that there are no other state changes or upgrades being performed in this handler.
Please verify if any additional upgrade logic specific to v27 needs to be implemented in this handler. If not, consider adding a comment explaining why no additional changes are needed for this upgrade.
To assist in verification, you can search for TODOs or FIXMEs related to v27 upgrades:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for TODOs or FIXMEs related to v27 upgrades rg --type go "TODO|FIXME.*v27.*upgrade"If there are no results, it might indicate that no additional logic is required for this upgrade.
Tools
GitHub Check: go (00)
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statementGitHub Check: osmosisd-darwin-amd64
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statementGitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement (typecheck)
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement) (typecheck)GitHub Check: test
[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement
12-17: Verify the return type of CreateUpgradeHandler.The function signature looks correct, but static analysis tools have flagged a potential type mismatch for the return value. This could be due to changes in the SDK version or a minor type discrepancy.
Please verify that the
upgradetypes.UpgradeHandlertype is compatible with the returned function type. You may need to check the SDK version being used and ensure it matches the expected types.To assist in verification, you can run the following command to check the definition of
upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler:If the definitions don't match, you may need to update either the import or the function signature to resolve the type mismatch.
tests/e2e/containers/config.go (3)
27-27: LGTM: Version update for previousVersionOsmoTagThe update of
previousVersionOsmoTagfrom "25.0.0-alpine" to "26.0.0-alpine" is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of upgrading to v27. This change ensures that the previous version is properly set for upgrade testing.
Line range hint
1-85: Summary: Version updates look good, but verify consistency across the projectThe changes in this file correctly update the previous version tags from v25 to v26, which is consistent with an upgrade to v27. However, there's a potential inconsistency between these changes and the PR objectives:
- The PR objectives mention increasing E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile by 1.
- The changes in this file suggest an upgrade from v25 to v26, not v26 to v27 as implied in the PR objectives.
To ensure project-wide consistency, please verify the following:
- Check if the E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile has been updated correctly.
- Confirm that all other relevant files (e.g., .vscode/launch.json) have been updated to reflect the correct version numbers.
- Review the PR description to ensure it accurately describes the changes being made.
You can use the following script to check for version references across the project:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for version references across the project echo "Checking Makefile for E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION:" grep -n "E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION" Makefile echo "\nChecking .vscode/launch.json for OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION:" grep -n "OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION" .vscode/launch.json echo "\nChecking for other version references:" grep -r -n "v2[567]" --include="*.go" --include="*.json" --include="Makefile" .This will help ensure that all version references are consistent throughout the project.
30-30: LGTM: Version update for previousVersionInitTag, but verify consistencyThe update of
previousVersionInitTagfrom "25.0.0" to "26.0.0" is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of upgrading to v27. This change ensures that the previous version is properly set for upgrade testing.However, there's a potential inconsistency to note:
- The PR objectives mention increasing E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile by 1.
- The changes in this file suggest an upgrade from v25 to v26, not v26 to v27 as implied in the PR objectives.
Please verify if this inconsistency is intentional or if additional changes are needed. You can use the following script to check the E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile:
Verification successful
Confirmed: Version update for previousVersionInitTag is correct and consistent
The update of
previousVersionInitTagfrom "25.0.0" to "26.0.0" is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of upgrading to v27. This change ensures that the previous version is properly set for upgrade testing.The E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile and OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the launch.json file are both set to "v27", which is consistent with the upgrade process. The change in this file is updating the previous version tag, which should indeed be v26 when upgrading to v27.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in Makefile grep -n "E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION" MakefileLength of output: 245902
Makefile (1)
47-47: LGTM: E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION updated correctly.The update of
E2E_UPGRADE_VERSIONfrom "v26" to "v27" is consistent with the PR objectives for creating a new upgrade handler version.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following command to check for any other occurrences of "v26" that might need updating:
This will help identify any other files that might need to be updated to maintain consistency with this version change.
Verification successful
Verification Successful:
E2E_UPGRADE_VERSIONUpdated Correctly and No Unintendedv26References Found.All instances of
v26identified are within dependency paths and do not impact the project's upgrade consistency.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for "v26" in all files, excluding the .git directory and binary files rg --type-not binary --glob '!.git' 'v26'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for "v26" in all files, excluding the .git directory and binary files rg -I --glob '!.git' 'v26'Length of output: 164765
.vscode/launch.json (1)
50-50: LGTM: Version update for E2E upgrade testingThe change from "v26" to "v27" for the
OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSIONenvironment variable is consistent with the PR objectives. This update is crucial for ensuring that the E2E tests run against the correct version during the upgrade process.To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of "v26" that might need updating:
This will help identify any other files that might need to be updated to maintain consistency with this version change.
Verification successful
To ensure consistency across the project and verify if there are any other occurrences of the
OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSIONvariable that might need updating, let's run the following script:This script will help us identify any other places where the
OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSIONvariable is used and might need to be updated to maintain consistency with the version change.
LGTM: E2E upgrade version update is consistent
The change from "v26" to "v27" for the
OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSIONenvironment variable in.vscode/launch.jsonis consistent with the project's upgrade process. This variable is used in E2E tests and makefiles, and updating it is a necessary step for testing the new upgrade.To ensure a smooth upgrade process:
- Review the E2E tests to confirm they're prepared for the v27 upgrade.
- Update any hardcoded version references in the test files if necessary.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of "v26" in the project # Search for "v26" in all files, excluding the .git directory and binary files rg --type-add 'ignore:*.{so,o,a,dylib,dll,exe}' --type-not ignore -i "v26" .Length of output: 256191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in all files rg "OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION" .Length of output: 1659
app/app.go (1)
195-195: LGTM: Upgrade slice updated correctlyThe addition of
v27.Upgradeto theUpgradesslice is correct and necessary for registering the new upgrade with the application.To ensure the integration is complete, please run the application's test suite, paying particular attention to upgrade-related tests. This will help verify that the new v27 upgrade is properly integrated into the system.
| @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ | |||
| v24 "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v24" | |||
| v25 "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v25" | |||
| v26 "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v26" | |||
| v27 "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
v27 Upgrade struct not found
The v27 upgrade package is missing the required Upgrade struct definition.
- File:
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go
Please ensure that the Upgrade struct is properly defined to register the new upgrade.
Analysis chain
Verify the v27 upgrade package
The addition of the v27 upgrade import looks correct and follows the established pattern for introducing new upgrades.
To ensure the v27 upgrade package is properly implemented, please run the following verification:
This script will check for the existence of the v27 upgrade package and its basic structure. If any issues are found, please address them before merging this change.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and basic structure of the v27 upgrade package
if [ -d "app/upgrades/v27" ]; then
echo "v27 upgrade directory exists"
if [ -f "app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go" ]; then
echo "v27 upgrades.go file exists"
grep -q "var Upgrade = Upgrade{" "app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go" && echo "v27 Upgrade struct found" || echo "v27 Upgrade struct not found"
else
echo "v27 upgrades.go file not found"
fi
else
echo "v27 upgrade directory not found"
fi
Length of output: 334
Tools
GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
[failure] 137-137:
could not import github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27 (-: # github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27
PaddyMc
added
A:no-changelog
V:state/compatible/no_backport
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
scripts/empty_upgrade_handler_gen.sh (1)
Line range hint
1-145: Consider improving script maintainabilityWhile the changes we've reviewed are appropriate, I'd like to make a general comment about the script itself. This script performs many complex operations and touches multiple files across the project. To improve maintainability and reduce the risk of errors, consider the following suggestions:
- Break down the script into smaller, focused functions for each major operation (e.g., creating new files, updating app.go, updating e2e versions).
- Add more comments explaining the purpose and logic of each section.
- Consider using a more robust scripting language like Python for complex file manipulations and version comparisons.
- Implement error checking and logging throughout the script to make debugging easier.
- Create unit tests for the script to ensure it behaves correctly under different scenarios.
These improvements would make the script easier to maintain and modify in the future, reducing the risk of introducing errors during upgrades.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
- scripts/empty_upgrade_handler_gen.sh (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go
Additional comments not posted (2)
scripts/empty_upgrade_handler_gen.sh (2)
50-51: LGTM: Import statement added for context packageThe addition of the
"context"import and the newline after it are appropriate changes. This import is necessary for the upcoming modification to theCreateUpgradeHandlerfunction signature, which will use thecontext.Contexttype. The newline improves readability by separating different types of imports.
82-82: Approved: Updated CreateUpgradeHandler function signatureThe change from
sdk.Contexttocontext.Contextfor thectxparameter is appropriate and aligns with the new import statement. This modification represents a shift towards using the standard Go context package, which is a good practice for managing request-scoped data and cancellation signals.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
Verification successful
Verified:
CreateUpgradeHandlerfunctions now usecontext.ContextNo instances of
sdk.Contextwere found inCreateUpgradeHandlerfunctions, confirming that the context parameter has been successfully migrated to the standardcontext.Contextas intended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of sdk.Context in upgrade handlers # Search for sdk.Context usage in upgrade handlers echo "Checking for sdk.Context usage in upgrade handlers:" rg --type go 'func\s+CreateUpgradeHandler.*sdk\.Context' app/upgrades # Search for context.Context usage in upgrade handlers echo "Checking for context.Context usage in upgrade handlers:" rg --type go 'func\s+CreateUpgradeHandler.*context\.Context' app/upgrades # Note: If the first command returns results or the second command doesn't return results for all upgrade handlers, # further investigation may be needed to ensure consistency across all upgrade handlers.Length of output: 381
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of sdk.Context and context.Context in CreateUpgradeHandler functions using ast-grep # Search for CreateUpgradeHandler functions with sdk.Context echo "Searching for CreateUpgradeHandler functions using sdk.Context:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func CreateUpgradeHandler(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error)' . # Search for CreateUpgradeHandler functions with context.Context echo "Searching for CreateUpgradeHandler functions using context.Context:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func CreateUpgradeHandler(ctx context.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error)' .Length of output: 595
Update report