Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚠️ Bump ClusterExtension API to v1 #1228

Merged

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

@perdasilva perdasilva commented Sep 6, 2024

Description

  • Updates ClusterExtension to v1
  • Adds operatorsv1alpha1 package alias for operators/v1alpha1
  • Does NOT update to catalogd v1 (as that's not merged or released yet)

Closes #1155

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@perdasilva perdasilva requested a review from a team as a code owner September 6, 2024 15:14
@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title ⚠️ Bump CatalogExtension API to v1 [HOLD] ⚠️ Bump CatalogExtension API to v1 Sep 6, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 05f03c6
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/6733bc3c0fbe080008eac482
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1228--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from d847c22 to f5ee8f8 Compare September 6, 2024 16:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.30435% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.76%. Comparing base (aaa0e00) to head (05f03c6).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/controllers/common_controller.go 82.35% 3 Missing ⚠️
internal/applier/helm.go 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
internal/contentmanager/sourcerer.go 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
internal/resolve/resolver.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1228      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.88%   74.76%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        3241     3241              
==========================================
- Hits         2427     2423       -4     
- Misses        643      646       +3     
- Partials      171      172       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 52.05% <81.15%> (ø)
unit 57.05% <66.66%> (-0.13%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from f5ee8f8 to c28a8e4 Compare September 6, 2024 17:01
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yashoza19 I just saw that you had your name down on the ticket to bump the API. I was on a bit of rampage today and didn't notice and went ahead and did it. I'm sorry about that. If it's helpful, please take what I've done here, otherwise, I'm happy to close. Apologies again =(

@yashoza19
Copy link
Contributor

@yashoza19 I just saw that you had your name down on the ticket to bump the API. I was on a bit of rampage today and didn't notice and went ahead and did it. I'm sorry about that. If it's helpful, please take what I've done here, otherwise, I'm happy to close. Apologies again =(

@perdasilva No worries at all. I was holding this issue off until we are done with all the other issues in epic-v1.

@LalatenduMohanty
Copy link
Member

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 9, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 11, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from c28a8e4 to 99301a4 Compare September 11, 2024 15:00
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 11, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from 99301a4 to e75be81 Compare September 11, 2024 15:01
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 12, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from e75be81 to 05ac2e2 Compare September 12, 2024 09:40
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 12, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva marked this pull request as draft September 12, 2024 13:39
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 12, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from 05ac2e2 to 39632f2 Compare September 13, 2024 08:49
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 17, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from 39632f2 to 82c0ef0 Compare September 20, 2024 12:40
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 20, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch 2 times, most recently from 374f2ce to ccf704f Compare September 25, 2024 15:34
@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title [HOLD] ⚠️ Bump CatalogExtension API to v1 [HOLD] ⚠️ Bump ClusterExtension API to v1 Sep 25, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 28, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from ccf704f to 1552e77 Compare October 7, 2024 08:41
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 7, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/api/bump-to-v1 branch from 1552e77 to e41bc8f Compare October 7, 2024 13:07
and other minor version changes that were missed when bumping
API versions to v1.

Signed-off-by: everettraven <[email protected]>
@everettraven everettraven changed the title [HOLD] ⚠️ Bump ClusterExtension API to v1 ⚠️ Bump ClusterExtension API to v1 Nov 12, 2024
@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 12, 2024
@everettraven everettraven added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit cb08ad4 Nov 12, 2024
18 of 20 checks passed
m1kola pushed a commit to m1kola/operator-controller that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
The latest release v1.0.0-rc1 includes the change to the API:
OLM v1alpha1 APIs became v1 and this needs to be reflected
in the upgrade-e2e CI job.

Refs:
* operator-framework#1228
* operator-framework#1441

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <[email protected]>
@m1kola m1kola mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2024
4 tasks
m1kola pushed a commit to m1kola/operator-controller that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
There are a few remaining references to v1alpha1 that need to be
updated to use v1.

Ref:
* operator-framework#1228

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <[email protected]>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
The latest release v1.0.0-rc1 includes the change to the API:
OLM v1alpha1 APIs became v1 and this needs to be reflected
in the upgrade-e2e CI job.

Refs:
* #1228
* #1441

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <[email protected]>
m1kola pushed a commit to m1kola/operator-controller that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
There are a few remaining references to v1alpha1 that need to be
updated to use v1.

Ref:
* operator-framework#1228

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <[email protected]>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
There are a few remaining references to v1alpha1 that need to be
updated to use v1.

Ref:
* #1228

Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Promote v1alpha1 ClusterExtension API version to v1
6 participants