Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
OpenZFS 9426 - metaslab size can exceed offset addressable by spacemap
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Authored by: Don Brady <[email protected]>
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <[email protected]>
Ported-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <[email protected]>

OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9426
OpenZFS-commit: openzfs/openzfs@f1c88afb1
Closes #7700
  • Loading branch information
Don Brady authored and behlendorf committed Jul 11, 2018
1 parent e902ddb commit e4e94ca
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 67 additions and 28 deletions.
13 changes: 12 additions & 1 deletion man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ Use \fB1\fR for yes (default) and \fB0\fR for no.
\fBvdev_max_ms_count\fR (int)
.ad
.RS 12n
When a vdev is added, it will be divided into approximately (but no more than) this number of metaslabs.
When a vdev is added target this number of metaslabs per top-level vdev.
.sp
Default value: \fB200\fR.
.RE
Expand All @@ -312,6 +312,17 @@ Minimum number of metaslabs to create in a top-level vdev.
Default value: \fB16\fR.
.RE

.sp
.ne 2
.na
\fBvdev_ms_count_limit\fR (int)
.ad
.RS 12n
Practical upper limit of total metaslabs per top-level vdev.
.sp
Default value: \fB131,072\fR.
.RE

.sp
.ne 2
.na
Expand Down
82 changes: 55 additions & 27 deletions module/zfs/vdev.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,15 +52,21 @@
#include <sys/zvol.h>
#include <sys/zfs_ratelimit.h>

/* maximum number of metaslabs per top-level vdev */
/* target number of metaslabs per top-level vdev */
int vdev_max_ms_count = 200;

/* minimum amount of metaslabs per top-level vdev */
/* minimum number of metaslabs per top-level vdev */
int vdev_min_ms_count = 16;

/* see comment in vdev_metaslab_set_size() */
/* practical upper limit of total metaslabs per top-level vdev */
int vdev_ms_count_limit = 1ULL << 17;

/* lower limit for metaslab size (512M) */
int vdev_default_ms_shift = 29;

/* upper limit for metaslab size (256G) */
int vdev_max_ms_shift = 38;

int vdev_validate_skip = B_FALSE;

/*
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2130,34 +2136,53 @@ void
vdev_metaslab_set_size(vdev_t *vd)
{
uint64_t asize = vd->vdev_asize;
uint64_t ms_shift = 0;
uint64_t ms_count = asize >> vdev_default_ms_shift;
uint64_t ms_shift;

/*
* For vdevs that are bigger than 8G the metaslab size varies in
* a way that the number of metaslabs increases in powers of two,
* linearly in terms of vdev_asize, starting from 16 metaslabs.
* So for vdev_asize of 8G we get 16 metaslabs, for 16G, we get 32,
* and so on, until we hit the maximum metaslab count limit
* [vdev_max_ms_count] from which point the metaslab count stays
* the same.
* There are two dimensions to the metaslab sizing calculation:
* the size of the metaslab and the count of metaslabs per vdev.
* In general, we aim for vdev_max_ms_count (200) metaslabs. The
* range of the dimensions are as follows:
*
* 2^29 <= ms_size <= 2^38
* 16 <= ms_count <= 131,072
*
* On the lower end of vdev sizes, we aim for metaslabs sizes of
* at least 512MB (2^29) to minimize fragmentation effects when
* testing with smaller devices. However, the count constraint
* of at least 16 metaslabs will override this minimum size goal.
*
* On the upper end of vdev sizes, we aim for a maximum metaslab
* size of 256GB. However, we will cap the total count to 2^17
* metaslabs to keep our memory footprint in check.
*
* The net effect of applying above constrains is summarized below.
*
* vdev size metaslab count
* -------------|-----------------
* < 8GB ~16
* 8GB - 100GB one per 512MB
* 100GB - 50TB ~200
* 50TB - 32PB one per 256GB
* > 32PB ~131,072
* -------------------------------
*/
ms_shift = vdev_default_ms_shift;

if ((asize >> ms_shift) < vdev_min_ms_count) {
/*
* For devices that are less than 8G we want to have
* exactly 16 metaslabs. We don't want less as integer
* division rounds down, so less metaslabs mean more
* wasted space. We don't want more as these vdevs are
* small and in the likely event that we are running
* out of space, the SPA will have a hard time finding
* space due to fragmentation.
*/
if (ms_count < vdev_min_ms_count)
ms_shift = highbit64(asize / vdev_min_ms_count);
ms_shift = MAX(ms_shift, SPA_MAXBLOCKSHIFT);

} else if ((asize >> ms_shift) > vdev_max_ms_count) {
else if (ms_count > vdev_max_ms_count)
ms_shift = highbit64(asize / vdev_max_ms_count);
else
ms_shift = vdev_default_ms_shift;

if (ms_shift < SPA_MAXBLOCKSHIFT) {
ms_shift = SPA_MAXBLOCKSHIFT;
} else if (ms_shift > vdev_max_ms_shift) {
ms_shift = vdev_max_ms_shift;
/* cap the total count to constrain memory footprint */
if ((asize >> ms_shift) > vdev_ms_count_limit)
ms_shift = highbit64(asize / vdev_ms_count_limit);
}

vd->vdev_ms_shift = ms_shift;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4392,13 +4417,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vdev_clear);
/* BEGIN CSTYLED */
module_param(vdev_max_ms_count, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vdev_max_ms_count,
"Divide added vdev into approximately (but no more than) this number "
"of metaslabs");
"Target number of metaslabs per top-level vdev");

module_param(vdev_min_ms_count, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vdev_min_ms_count,
"Minimum number of metaslabs per top-level vdev");

module_param(vdev_ms_count_limit, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vdev_ms_count_limit,
"Practical upper limit of total metaslabs per top-level vdev");

module_param(zfs_delays_per_second, uint, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(zfs_delays_per_second, "Rate limit delay events to this many "
"IO delays per second");
Expand Down

0 comments on commit e4e94ca

Please sign in to comment.