Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

daemon: Don't do OS updates/pivoting on !RHCOS #454

Merged

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Without this we end up in a reboot loop. Happened
for the UPI scaleup tests on CentOS (classic).

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 18, 2019
Without this we end up in a reboot loop.  Happened
for the UPI scaleup tests on CentOS (classic).
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 18, 2019
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like #451 hit the unit test.

/test unit

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

HAProxy Router, EBS, TestKubletConfig flakes

/retest

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 18, 2019

This looks good to me, any way anyone can live test it out? Otherwise, I believe this is right

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 18, 2019

I'm actually going to approve and lgtm as it's the right fix anyway afaict

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, runcom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 18, 2019

level=fatal msg="failed to initialize the cluster: Cluster operator network has not yet reported success"

/retest

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

I'm actually going to approve and lgtm as it's the right fix anyway afaict

Remember it won't get in if it doesn't pass CI, so I often lgtm before tests are known to pass.

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 18, 2019

Remember it won't get in if it doesn't pass CI, so I often lgtm before tests are known to pass.

yeah, I just wanted someone to actually test this fix live but I get it's not that straightforward and wanted to prevent a merge with my lgtm if it turned out to be wrong, but again, this is correct anyway

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 18, 2019

network runtime bug again

/retest

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 18, 2019

aws limit, will retest in some minutes

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 18, 2019

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 19, 2019

unit flake #449

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Feb 19, 2019

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 36e354d into openshift:master Feb 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants