Upstream #4430: Corrected detection of K8s minor version #54
Conversation
Fixes coredns#4428 Signed-off-by: Lars Ekman <[email protected]>
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
approved
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Miciah, sgreene570 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
sgreene570
changed the title
|
unit test failure appears to be a fluke |
|
/retest |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
6 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@sgreene570: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Fixes coredns#4428
Signed-off-by: Lars Ekman [email protected]
1. Why is this pull request needed and what does it do?
2. Which issues (if any) are related?
3. Which documentation changes (if any) need to be made?
4. Does this introduce a backward incompatible change or deprecation?
This is a manual cherry-pick of coredns#4430, as a follow up to #52 & openshift/cluster-dns-operator#244