Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding test for KNNWeight #759

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2023
Merged

Adding test for KNNWeight #759

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
6396272
Adding test for KNNWeight
martin-gaievski Feb 10, 2023
dc59a75
Changing segment name to be consistent with the file names
martin-gaievski Feb 14, 2023
e5ade46
Refactor code to eleminate unneccessary exception catch
martin-gaievski Feb 14, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions build.gradle
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -165,6 +165,9 @@ dependencies {
api group: 'com.google.guava', name: 'guava', version:'30.0-jre'
api group: 'commons-lang', name: 'commons-lang', version: '2.6'
testFixturesImplementation "org.opensearch.test:framework:${opensearch_version}"
testImplementation group: 'net.bytebuddy', name: 'byte-buddy', version: '1.12.22'
testImplementation group: 'org.objenesis', name: 'objenesis', version: '3.2'
testImplementation group: 'net.bytebuddy', name: 'byte-buddy-agent', version: '1.12.22'
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is required to mock static classes/methods

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quick feedback on this:

  1. Is there a possibility that we fix src so that we don't need to mock static functions.
  2. Are we using junit4 or junit5 here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Making changes in source will be problematic, there are many such classes involved in call chain.
We're using junit4, 4.13 to be precise.

}


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -196,6 +199,8 @@ test {
dependsOn buildJniLib
systemProperty 'tests.security.manager', 'false'
systemProperty "java.library.path", "$rootDir/jni/release"
//this change enables mockito-inline that supports mocking of static classes/calls
systemProperty "jdk.attach.allowAttachSelf", true
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is required to mock static classes/methods

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a comment in the file itself.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ack

if (Os.isFamily(Os.FAMILY_WINDOWS)) {
// Add the paths of built JNI libraries and its dependent libraries to PATH variable in System variables
environment('PATH', System.getenv('PATH') + ";$rootDir/jni/release" + ";$rootDir/src/main/resources/windowsDependencies")
Expand Down
Loading