[Backport 2.2] Avoid use of indicesService in Resume replicaiton flow (#1030)

[monusingh-1]

Avoid use of indicesService in Resume replicaiton flow.
Signed-off-by: monusingh-1 [email protected]

Description

[Describe what this change achieves]

Issues Resolved

[List any issues this PR will resolve]

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1045 (b3f6a13) into 2.2 (ce598ff) will decrease coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head b3f6a13 differs from pull request most recent head 0231a6b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0231a6b to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.2    #1045      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     74.79%   74.56%   -0.23%     
  Complexity     1026     1026              
============================================
  Files           141      141              
  Lines          4685     4683       -2     
  Branches        521      521              
============================================
- Hits           3504     3492      -12     
- Misses          859      866       +7     
- Partials        322      325       +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...on/resume/TransportResumeIndexReplicationAction.kt	86.95% <100.00%> (-0.37%)	⬇️
...ication/seqno/RemoteClusterRetentionLeaseHelper.kt	72.44% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes