-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixing dls/fls logic around numeric aggregations #789
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -156,10 +156,7 @@ | |
import org.opensearch.ad.transport.handler.AnomalyIndexHandler; | ||
import org.opensearch.ad.transport.handler.AnomalyResultBulkIndexHandler; | ||
import org.opensearch.ad.transport.handler.MultiEntityResultHandler; | ||
import org.opensearch.ad.util.ClientUtil; | ||
import org.opensearch.ad.util.DiscoveryNodeFilterer; | ||
import org.opensearch.ad.util.IndexUtils; | ||
import org.opensearch.ad.util.Throttler; | ||
import org.opensearch.ad.util.*; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. minor: should we avoid using import *? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, will fix in other PRs since 1.3.8 is due today. |
||
import org.opensearch.client.Client; | ||
import org.opensearch.cluster.metadata.IndexNameExpressionResolver; | ||
import org.opensearch.cluster.node.DiscoveryNodes; | ||
|
@@ -230,6 +227,7 @@ public class AnomalyDetectorPlugin extends Plugin implements ActionPlugin, Scrip | |
private ThreadPool threadPool; | ||
private ADStats adStats; | ||
private ClientUtil clientUtil; | ||
private SecurityClientUtil securityClientUtil; | ||
private DiscoveryNodeFilterer nodeFilter; | ||
private IndexUtils indexUtils; | ||
private ADTaskCacheManager adTaskCacheManager; | ||
|
@@ -352,11 +350,21 @@ public Collection<Object> createComponents( | |
SingleFeatureLinearUniformInterpolator singleFeatureLinearUniformInterpolator = | ||
new IntegerSensitiveSingleFeatureLinearUniformInterpolator(); | ||
Interpolator interpolator = new LinearUniformInterpolator(singleFeatureLinearUniformInterpolator); | ||
NodeStateManager stateManager = new NodeStateManager( | ||
client, | ||
xContentRegistry, | ||
settings, | ||
clientUtil, | ||
getClock(), | ||
AnomalyDetectorSettings.HOURLY_MAINTENANCE, | ||
clusterService | ||
); | ||
securityClientUtil = new SecurityClientUtil(stateManager, settings); | ||
SearchFeatureDao searchFeatureDao = new SearchFeatureDao( | ||
client, | ||
xContentRegistry, | ||
interpolator, | ||
clientUtil, | ||
securityClientUtil, | ||
settings, | ||
clusterService, | ||
AnomalyDetectorSettings.NUM_SAMPLES_PER_TREE | ||
|
@@ -381,16 +389,6 @@ public Collection<Object> createComponents( | |
adCircuitBreakerService | ||
); | ||
|
||
NodeStateManager stateManager = new NodeStateManager( | ||
client, | ||
xContentRegistry, | ||
settings, | ||
clientUtil, | ||
getClock(), | ||
AnomalyDetectorSettings.HOURLY_MAINTENANCE, | ||
clusterService | ||
); | ||
|
||
FeatureManager featureManager = new FeatureManager( | ||
searchFeatureDao, | ||
interpolator, | ||
|
@@ -699,6 +697,7 @@ public PooledObject<LinkedBuffer> wrap(LinkedBuffer obj) { | |
threadPool, | ||
clusterService, | ||
client, | ||
securityClientUtil, | ||
adCircuitBreakerService, | ||
featureManager, | ||
adTaskManager, | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this ready user information stored in AD job? I think we have no way to get user information from security plugin. Just asking to learn more
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it is from AD job.